Lois Lerner Accused of Using Personal E-mail for Official Business

Aug 16th 2013
Share this content

By Ken Berry

Lois Lerner can't catch a break. First, the embattled head of the Exempt Organization (EO) division of the IRS – and one of the central figures in the ongoing "Tea Party scandal" – was forced to take an unpaid leave of absence after she refused to testify before Congress. Now House Republicans are asking her to provide official documents she purportedly sent to her personal e-mail account. 

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, one of several panels investigating the Tea Party matter and other IRS missteps, made the request in a letter sent to the IRS on August 13. In the letter, Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) alleges that Lerner forwarded official government documents to her personal e-mail account in violation of federal laws. 

"Through the course of the investigation, we have learned that you sent documents related to your official duties from your official IRS e-mail account to an e-mail account labeled 'Lois Home.' This raises some serious questions concerning your use of a nonofficial e-mail account to conduct official business", Issa stated in the letter. "Accordingly, we write to request documents related to your official duties that are housed in nonofficial e-mail accounts."

"The use of nonofficial e-mail accounts to conduct official business implicates federal records requirements. Use of a nonofficial e-mail account to conduct government business raises the prospect that records – as defined by the Federal Records Act – are not captured by official government e-mail archiving systems", the letter continues." It also creates difficulties in fulfilling the IRS' obligations under the Freedom of Information Act and other litigation requests. Your use of nonofficial e-mail account also frustrates congressional oversight obligations."

Earlier this year, the IRS admitted that it wrongfully targeted Tea Party and other conservative groups applying for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status. In the wake of the disclosure, Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller resigned, while other top IRS officials have been grilled by Congress. The scandal is just one of several black eyes the IRS has suffered in recent months, including charges that its staffers enjoyed lavish accommodations at conferences and wasted taxpayer money producing video parodies for training sessions.

When questioned by the House oversight committee on May 22 about her role in the proceedings at the EO division, Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment rights. At the time, she proclaimed",I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations." Lerner was promptly place on unpaid leave where she has been languishing ever since.

Issa and Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) established a firm deadline of August 27 at 5:00 p.m. for Lerner to comply with their request to produce the documents. The IRS has yet to comment on the issue.

Related articles:


Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

By PeterTx
Jun 25th 2015 20:11 EDT

"When questioned by the House oversight committee on May 22 about her
role in the proceedings at the EO division, Lerner invoked her Fifth
Amendment rights"
actually she read a statement that stated her version of events then she invoked the Fifth amendment. Most legal minds agree that reading the statement invalidated her ability to invoke the Fifth amendment. Watch past Congressional investigations and you see that witnesses who invoked the 5th amendment did not read a statement prior to invoking the 5th.

Thanks (0)
By ElmerStoup
Jun 25th 2015 20:11 EDT

We IRS agents are constantly reminded not to use personal emails to transmit taxpayer information. In fact, we have to encrypt emails with taxpayer information when using our official email address.
Thus, apart from using her personal email account to discuss non-taxpayer specific issues, she would have violated IRS rules if she did indeed discuss taxpayer-specific issues in a personal email account.

Thanks (0)