Share this content
IRS criminal investigations
tzahiV_iStock_taxcourt

Tax Court Offers Relief to Innocent Spouse

by

When clients file a joint tax return with their spouse, they are “jointly and severally” liable for the tax payments. This means that the IRS can come after either one of them, or both, if they owe tax. This includes back taxes, penalties and interest. A new Tax Court case found there's an exception to that rule.

Aug 16th 2022
Share this content

If a couple files a joint tax return, they are generally both liable for any tax liability, even if only one of the spouses is responsible for the shortfall. However, you might get off the hook if you qualify as an “innocent spouse.” A Tax Court new case, Pocock, TC Memo 2022-55, 6/6/22, shows when equitable relief may be available if paying Uncle Sam would result in economic hardship.

Basic rules:  There’s a chance your client may be held personally liable for a tax debt even if they were completely unaware of the situation. And simply getting divorced doesn’t matter.

There’s a way out if they’re treated as an “innocent spouse” under IRS rules. To qualify, they must meet all of the following requirements.

  • Filed a joint return that has an understatement of tax due to erroneous items of your spouse (or former spouse).
  • Establish that at the time you signed the joint return you did not know, and had no reason to know, that there was an understatement of tax.
  • Taking into account all the facts and circumstances, it would be unfair to hold you liable for the understatement of tax.
  • You and your spouse (or former spouse) have not transferred property to one another as part of a fraudulent scheme. A fraudulent scheme includes a scheme to defraud the IRS or another third party, such as a creditor, ex-spouse or business partner.

If a spouse does not qualify for innocent spouse relief as stated above, they may still qualify for equitable relief. For these purposes, the determination is based on all the facts and circumstances, including several critical factors relied on by the IRS. Notably, as it pertains to the new case, it is significant if the taxpayer requesting to be treated as an innocent spouse will suffer economic hardship in the event that relief isn’t granted.

Facts of the case: A married couple, residents of Michigan, had a rocky relationship for years before the husband left, including allegations of physical and verbal abuse by the husband. The wife relocated to Florida where she started a new life.

However, the husband eventually also moved to Florida and they reconnected.Even though they divorced, the couple lived together in a house they had bought with financial assistance from another party. The wife thought it was best for them to maintain the home for the sake of their two kids.

From 1995 through 2005, the husband fraudulently claimed large refunds on their joint returns by misstating his income and federal income tax withholdings. Although she benefitted from the fraud, the wife had no part in filing these tax returns or any of his illegal schemes.

Finally, the Tax Court determined that the wife would suffer economic hardship if she were for forced to pay her tax liability. The Court would not require the wife to sell the home to help pay the debt.

Result: Innocent spouse relief was granted.

Replies (1)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By Rachelsdad
Aug 17th 2022 09:34 EDT

The returns for which petitioner (Mrs. Pocock) sought relief were joint filings in 2006, 2007, and 2008. The couple did not, in fact, divorce until 2011 and - importantly - subsequent to the Commissioner's determination. The husband's fraud, therefor, and the tax debt arising therefrom, occurred while they were married, thus entitling the wife to innocent spouse relief (as she was able to prove).

The article here seemed to imply that the fraudulent refunds were claimed on the (former) husband's returns, when in fact, these were joint filings. I couldn't wrap my head around innocent spouse relief applying to debt incurred subsequent to divorce (as it cannot).

Thanks (1)