Microsoft Admits to Privacy Errors With Passport
Microsoft has admitted that it has not properly protected the privacy and security of people who provided personal information through Passport as it settled with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
The company agreed to beef up the security of Passport and be more open with customers about what it does with their personal data. The company also agreed to allow an outside audit of its practices every two years. In a significant concession, Microsoft agreed to be monitored for 20 years.
The FTC admitted that it had found no actual security breaches, and agreed that Microsoft had not shared consumer data improperly with other companies. But FTC chairman Timothy J. Muris said Microsoft was not meeting the levels of privacy protection and security that it had promised users of Passport.
Microsoft was deemed to have lied about the effectiveness of its measures to protect users' personal information — including credit card numbers collected for the Passport Wallet shopping service. It also said Microsoft had falsely claimed that purchases made with Passport Wallet were "safer or more secure" than purchases made at the same site without Passport. But the FTC ruled: "In fact most consumers received identical security at those sites, regardless of whether they used Passport Wallet to complete their transactions.”
"Good security is fundamental to protecting consumer privacy," said Muris. "We’ll take action against companies that don't keep their promises. Companies that promise to keep personal information secure must follow reasonable and appropriate measures to do so. It's not only good business, it's the law."
The FTC ruling came out of a complaint in July 2001 contending that Microsoft's privacy practices, and especially the new Windows XP operating system and services like Passport, "are designed to obtain personal information from consumers in the United States unfairly and deceptively."
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.