Congress, Wireless Industry Working on Cell Phone Directory
Who hasn’t been in desperate need of someone’s cell phone number and cursed the lack of cell phone directory assistance? The wireless industry and Congress are debating the logistics and expect to soon have a directory available.
Congress is focusing its attention on privacy issues with legislation pending that would require cell phone users to "opt in" to the directory and would prevent the industry from collecting the "unlisted" charges people pay to keep their land line numbers private. That fee generates $50 million a year in revenue for telephone companies.
The Wireless 411 Consumer Privacy Act was introduced in both the House and the Senate before the holiday recess.
A recent survey showed that wireless customer care about privacy. Two percent would list their numbers with the directory if there were no privacy considerations, a number that jumps to 51 percent when privacy limits are included.
Competing wireless companies are being forced to work together to develop a directory, expected to make a limited debut later this year as a call-in service, not as a printed document. An alliance of wireless companies, working under the trade group Cellular Telecommunications Internet Association, has been meeting to determine the particulars of such a service, the Times reported.
"Each carrier will go forward on its own schedule," Travis Larson, a spokesperson for the trade group, told the Times. "There's no official industrywide date or time. Consumers might discover this organically, if you will."
Despite congressional involvement, the database may grow unchecked, one industry analyst told the Times. "Almost everyone has signed a contract," said Kathleen Pierz, an analyst who has published a treatise on wireless privacy. "Right in the tiny print you give permission to include yourself in a database. People are so totally unaware of that. If you just simply put people in a wireless directory, you will not only have a mass revolt, you will have the federal government, the FCC, breathing down your neck, and for good reason."
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.