WTO Wins Right to $4 Billion in Sanctions Against U.S.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled last Friday that the European Union (EU) has the right to impose trade sanctions amounting to $4.043 billion on the U.S. to make up for tax breaks given to U.S. corporations that export products to European countries.
The issue at task is a situation that occurs when a U.S. corporation creates an offshore subsidiary called a Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC), then exports American-made products through the FSC which is exempt from U.S. taxes. The EU claims the system equates to a subsidy to U.S. corporations that amounts to over $4 billion. The WTO agrees and has issued its ruling.
Lawmakers in Washington have passed previous legislation aimed at appeasing the WTO. The FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Act, passed in the Fall of 2000, provides a deduction for taxes based on overseas sales. The U.S. contends that the tax benefit allows U.S. exporters to sell internationally at a price competitive with that of international competitors. The WTO ruled last February that the law was not satisfactory.
Companies likely to be hurt the most should the U.S. cease offering tax breaks to exporters are Boeing, General Electric, Microsoft, Caterpillar, Motorola, Honeywell, and Cisco Systems.
The WTO has indicated it will allow the U.S. time to change its law and will not impose penalties immediately. Some analysts feel the penalties will become moot should the U.S. find a way to reach an acceptable level of compliance with the WTO requests. The $4 billion in sanctions is the highest amount ever awarded by the WTO. The next two highest awards were ultimately never imposed.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.