What voters said about tax hikes in November elections

As lawmakers try to solve budgetary shortfalls by raising taxes in most states, taxpayers are not pleased, and they said so earlier this month at the polls. Voter instincts mostly were to say no to new taxes. In some states, they also told lawmakers that future tax hikes and spending increases will be even harder to get past voters.

Forty-nine states are required to finish the year with a balanced budget. Only Vermont does not hold legislators to a balanced budget requirement. For the last two years, most states have solved their budget woes by raising taxes and slashing spending. Tapped-out taxpayers are feeling the strain and turned back many of the attempts by lawmakers to raise taxes for a third year in a row.
Following is a rundown of some of the key measures affecting taxes and how they fared:
In Washington State, the powers that be wanted to raise taxes on individuals making more than $200,000, and married couples making more than $400,000. Voters said no. But that was not their final word. They also told lawmakers that if they try to raise taxes again they will not only have to secure a majority, but a super majority or a statewide ballot.
Californians, on the other hand, voted to make the budget subject to a simple majority rather than the current two-thirds majority. California has become famous for annual budget deadlock that drags on for weeks. State law now says that if legislators cannot pass a budget by June 15, they must forfeit pay. Reverting to a simple majority should eliminate some of the deadlock, but makes spending sprees and tax hikes easier.
That doesn’t mean Californians were easy prey on other tax issues. They rejected a measure that would legalize marijuana, even though supporters used the argument that legalization would allow the state to tax sales of cannabis. In addition, California voters refused to pass two revenue raisers: higher fees for using state parks and an attempt to eliminate corporate tax breaks.
Indiana showed lawmakers how serious they were about holding down taxes by putting statutory property tax caps in the state constitution.
Missouri did something similar by adding to its constitution limits to property taxes and city income tax.
Montana voters rejected new taxes on property transfers or sales.
Massachusetts voters repealed a sales tax on alcohol, but they also rejected a drastic cut in overall state sales tax from the current level of 6.25 percent to 3 percent. That cut, if passed, was projected to cost the state $2.5 billion.
"I'm not surprised by that given the political period we're in," said Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers. Pattison told reporters that voters have been shaken by a rocky economy and their trust of government is low.
"We're still in a very scarce resource environment for states,” Pattison said. “So they're going to have to make tough choices. They've already done a lot of cutting. Will they continue to cut?"
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell told Reuters that the outcome of the elections was an indication that "the American people want limited government, less spending, a focus on job creation, and fiscal responsibility."
Some analysts pointed out the voters across the country have not been united in the way to fix fiscal problems.
Here is what happened in other states:
  • North Dakota voted to create a reserve from taxes on extraction.
  • Hawaii passed a measure allowing rebates when the state budget is at a surplus.
  • Several states, including South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Virginia voted to expand rainy-day funds, which should strengthen the municipal bond markets in each state and provide a way to solve budget woes when necessary.
"My sense is that voters want state budget problems fixed, but they don't want to be involved specifically in how it's done. They want to set ground rules," she said, adding that voters want to "tell governors what's off limits," Tracy Gordon, a visiting fellow at The Brookings Institution, told Reuters. Brookings is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit public policy organization.
Related items:

You may like these other stories...

Legislation coming out of Washington just might reduce homeowners' burden for disaster insurance. It's a topic very much on everyone's minds since the mudslide in Oso, Washington. The loss of human life was...
Divorce is hard, and the IRS isn't going to make it any easier. The IRS generally says "no" to tax deductions that might ease the pain of divorce. In certain circumstances, however, you might be able to salvage...
IRS chief: New rule on the way for tax-exempt groupsIRS Commissioner John Koskinen told the USA Today on Monday that the agency will likely rewrite a proposed rule regulating the political activities of nonprofit groups to...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Apr 17
In this exciting presentation Excel expert David H. Ringstrom, CPA shares tricks that you can use with pivot tables every day. Remember, either you work Excel, or it works you!
Apr 22
Is everyone at your organization meeting your client service expectations? Let client service expert, Kristen Rampe, CPA help you establish a reputation of top-tier service in every facet of your firm during this one hour webinar.
Apr 24
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA introduces you to a powerful but underutilized macro feature in Excel.
Apr 25
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations' revenues. It will include discussions of revenue recognition for cash and non-cash contributions as well as other revenues commonly received by non-profit organizations.