Two attorneys face the music in Son of Boss tax shelter

The verdict is in for two Texas attorneys – Cary Patterson and Harold Nix – who the IRS says used a Son of Bass tax shelter to eliminate the federal tax on millions of dollars. Between 1998 and 2000, the two men earned fees of more than $30 million each by representing the State of Texas in litigation against tobacco companies. When the IRS took them to court, Hix and Patterson lost and filed an appeal. Now the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against them again, after finding that the investment partnerships they set up lacked economic substance. For tax purposes, the Court said, the losses generated by the partnership, totaling more than $50 million, should be disregarded.

Acting Attorney General John A. DiCicco applauded the court ruling, saying in a statement that the court had "recognized that determinations of this sort must be made on the objective evidence irrespective of the claimed motives of the individual investors." The court did stop short, however, of adding penalties to the defendants' tax bills, as requested by the IRS.

Boss and Son of Boss

As the name implies, Son of Boss is an offshoot of Boss, which stands for Bond Options Sales Strategy. Boss was struck down by the IRS, after which the promoters of this scheme simply changed the game slightly and created the next generation of this type of scheme.

Son of Boss is the term used to define a category of complex tax maneuvers which ultimately create an artificial loss for investors, eliminating large capital gains while exposing the investors to minimal risk. The scheme involves a simple pattern that is made complex by being buried in mounds of paperwork designed to obfuscate that pattern and, it is hoped, deflect the attention of the IRS.

At the core of Son of Boss is a transaction in which the basis of the assets sold is artificially stepped-up. The result is a purported tax loss where there was no corresponding economic loss.

Basically, Son of Boss works this way: an investor purchases an asset worth a small amount (such as $50) from a company that is part of the scam. He purchases the asset for $50 cash plus a promissory note for $1 million, payable at a date in the distant future. The basis of the asset for tax purposes becomes $1,000,050. The taxpayer then sells the asset to another company involved in the scam, for $50, and incurs a $1,000,000 loss. That sounds simple, but in order for promoters of the tax shelters to make money, the transactions are made so complex that it is virtually impossible for the taxpayer to sort out. The tax shelter transaction is structured so as to seem to fit neatly within the tax code, to make it harder to detect.

Back in May of 2004 the IRS, the IRS issued a global settlement offer for taxpayers involved in Son of Boss cases. Since then, hundreds of taxpayers have settled their cases.

You may like these other stories...

The law makes it difficult for itemizers to deduct medical expenses. To reap any write-off, you must pay bills that aren't covered by insurance, reimbursed by employers or otherwise satisfied by, for example, a company-...
Drug patents held overseas can pare makers’ tax billsAs the Obama administration tries to stop companies from avoiding taxes by moving their headquarters overseas, the makers of some of the world’s most lucrative...
Starting in October, the IRS will send warning letters to tax return preparers who appear not to be complying with Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) due diligence requirements.Section 6695(g) of the Internal Revenue Code...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 9In this jam-packed presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA will give you a crash-course in creating spreadsheet-based dashboards.
Oct 15This webinar presents the requirements of AU-C 600, Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors).
Oct 21Kristen Rampe will share how to speak and write more effectively by understanding your own and your audience’s communication style.
Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.