Tax Practitioners Question Planned Methods to Curb Malpractice

A wide-ranging Internal Revenue Service (IRS) proposal to strengthen malpractice enforcement has sparked objections from tax practitioners and attorneys.

The agency would publicly list the names of tax attorneys and accountants who are under investigation for alleged violations of IRS professional practice rules, according to Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal. Current rules say the names are kept private until the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility formally investigates and assesses a penalty. Only then are the names and a small amount of additional information made public in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Tom Ochsenschlager, vice president of taxation for the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), told the newspaper: “You can imagine what would happen if a particular CPA is being charged with an infraction. Clients probably wouldn't go to him. Professional reputation is all we have to sell."

Public comment ended in June on the proposals, which could go into effect early next year if the Treasury Department approves. The stricter professional rules are meant to crack down on tax professionals who sell bogus tax shelters or who are “incompetent or disreputable.”

The possibility of opening enforcement proceedings to the public has been the most contentious issue, the Journal reported. The IRS believes practitioners could learn from others’ mistakes if the process were opened up, said Stephen Whitlock, acting director of the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility.

The proposal would also limit contingency-fee arrangements—the fees clients pay only if the practitioner wins the IRS dispute. Under the IRS plan, contingency fees would be limited to cases in which taxpayers are formally audited or challenged by the IRS. “Additionally,” the IRS said, “a broader prohibition against contingent fee arrangements is appropriate in light of concerns regarding attorney and auditor independence.” (See Federal Register, February 8, 2006.)

One business that would be affected by the proposal is TAARP Group, a Washington consultancy that reviews IRS-imposed interest and penalties to make sure they are correct. TAARP employees collect a contingency fee if the IRS penalty calculations are indeed wrong. Partner Mark H. Ely told the Journal that the proposed rules "would significantly impair our business."

Dennis Drapkin, head of the American Bar Association tax section, questions whether the IRS is overstepping its authority and interfering with the "attorney-client relationship."

You may like these other stories...

Did you know that the tax code allows you to claim tax deductions for household damage caused by thefts, vandalism, fires, floods, hurricanes, and others kinds of casualties? But the law imposes several restrictions.Relief...
Inversions: Loophole Is the ProblemJacob J. Lew, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal that "the system has become full of inefficiencies and special-interest loopholes. That...
School tax breaks get House support as Democrats objectRichard Rubin of Bloomberg reported that the House of Representatives on Thursday voted to expand and simplify tax breaks for education as Republicans continue to pass...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.