Supreme Court rules on IRS refusals | AccountingWEB

Supreme Court rules on IRS refusals

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that only the U.S. Tax Court may review refusals by the Internal Revenue Service to reduce interest payments on people who underpay their taxes.

The decision was required in the case of a couple -- John and Pamela Hinck -- assessed additional taxes. The Hincks sued for an $18,000 interest refund in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, alleging delays in processing their case.

Chief Justice John Roberts said federal law specifies that the tax court provides the exclusive jurisdiction for such cases. The claims court said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the Hincks' suit, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said only the U.S. Tax court had jurisdiction.

At issue is a 1996 provision in the tax code that allows the IRS to reduce interest attributable to any unreasonable error or delay by the agency.

Wait, there's more!
There's always more at AccountingWEB. We're an active community of financial professionals and journalists who strive to bring you valuable content every day. If you'd like, let us know your interests and we'll send you a few articles every week either in taxation, practice excellence, or just our most popular stories from that week. It's free to sign up and to be a part of our community.
Premium content is currently locked

Editor's Choice

WHAT KIND OF FIRM ARE YOU?
As part of our continued effort to provide valuable resources and insight to our subscribers, we're conducting this brief survey to learn more about your personal experiences in the accounting profession. We will be giving away five $50 Amazon gift cards, and a $250 Amazon gift card to one lucky participant.
This is strictly for internal use and data will not be sold
or shared with any third parties.