Stiff Court Penalties for Frivolous Appeals to Delay IRS Collections

In the past year, the U.S. Tax Court imposed nearly $136,000 in penalties on 23 taxpayers for pursuing frivolous cases to delay tax collections.

"The courts are increasingly recognizing the need to impose penalties on taxpayers pursuing frivolous cases," said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. "During the past year, we saw bigger penalties than we did for the previous two years combined. This is an important tool to help us maintain faith in the tax system. The IRS works diligently to protect taxpayer rights, and it is wrong for some taxpayers to abuse those rights by trying to delay collection for frivolous reasons."

The amount of penalties during the past year surpassed those assessed from 2001 until March 2003, when the Tax Court imposed $126,000 in penalties on 38 taxpayers. The average penalty increased to $5,509 during the past year, from an average of $3,316 in the previous period.

The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 set forth various taxpayer rights related to tax liens or levies, including the right to seek judicial review. The IRS usually may not enforce collection while an appeal is pending.

The Tax Court may impose sanctions of up to $25,000 on those who misuse their right to a court review merely to stall their tax payments. Last May, the court imposed this maximum penalty for the first time, finding in the case of Aston v. Commissioner that the taxpayer’s groundless argument was primarily for the purpose of delay, wasting the court’s time and resources.

Tax professionals who use such arguments for their clients are also subject to penalties. In Hillen v. Commissioner [Docket #1441-03L (2004)], the Tax Court imposed a penalty of more than $14,000 against attorney Paul Chappell after finding his frivolous arguments caused the Court to incur more than 50 hours of unnecessary work. The Court stated that Chappell, who had clerked for the Court and worked at the IRS, “should have known better than to make the arguments that he did.”

Appellate Courts affirmed the Tax Court’s penalties in seven cases in the last year and began to add their own penalties. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals imposed an additional sanction of $4,000 in Raynor v. Commissioner after affirming the Tax Court’s decision. Last month, the 1st Circuit imposed a $2,000 sanction in Marino v. Brown (357 F.3d 143) for intentionally challenging a collection action in District Court rather than Tax Court.

The IRS recently updated its Web site document, The Truth about Frivolous Tax Arguments, with a section devoted to Collection Due Process cases. It presents 16 frivolous assertions, along with a summary of the law and relevant cases involving these false claims. There are links to the document from The Newsroom section’s What’s Hot page, the Tax Pro News and the Topics for Individuals pages.

Related Items:

Section 6673 Penalties Imposed by U.S. Tax Court in Collection Due Process Cases[ T.C.M. = Tax Court Memorandum Decision ]





 Lyman v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-72  3/13/03   $3,000 
 Kaye v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-74  3/13/03   $4,000 
 Keown v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-69  3/13/03   $3,200
 Stoewer v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-71  3/13/03   $2,000
 Robinson v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-77  3/17/03  $11,000
 Cortes v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-80  3/19/03  $1,000
 Duncan v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-89  3/26/03  $2,500
 Frank v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-88  3/26/03  $3,500
 Widner v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-114  4/21/03  $600
 Bourbeau v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-117  4/22/03  $5,000
 Hodgson v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-122  4/28/03  $5,000
 Holquin v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-125  4/29/03  $1,600
 Aston v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-128  5/2/03  $25,000
 Kemper v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-195  7/8/03  $8,500
 Brashear v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-196  7/9/03  $1,600
 Horton v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-197  7/9/03  $4,400
 Israel v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-198  7/9/03  $1,500
 Green v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-264  9/10/03  $5,000
 Bethea v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-278  9/24/03  $2,000
 Pepper Pot Trust v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2003-287  10/7/03  $15,000
 Cipolla v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2004-4  1/5/04  $17,500
 Hathaway v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2004-15  1/23/04  $10,000
 Heaphy v. Commissioner  T.C.M. 2004-48  3/5/04  $3,000

Appeals Court Actions Affirming Tax Court's Sanctions


Citation (Circuit) 

Raynor v. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 14173 (5th Cir.)
 (In Raynor, an additional $4,000 sanction was imposed)
Hauck v. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 8578 (6th Cir.)
Wasson V. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 5739 (6th Cir.)
Barasch v. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 5603 (9th Cir.)
Call v. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 5603 (9th Cir.)
Haines v. Commissioner 2003 US App. Lexis 17583 (9th Cir.)
Israel v. Commissioner 2004 US App. Lexis 3449 (7th Cir.)

You may like these other stories...

Truckers and other owners of heavy highway vehicles take note: Your next federal highway use tax return is due on September 2.The September 2 due date, which was pushed back two days because the normal August 31 deadline...
The head of the IRS has a message for taxpayers and tax preparers who have endured long wait times while on the phone with the tax agency: Call your member of Congress.During his keynote speech at the 69th Annual Meeting of...
Regulators struggle with conflicts in credit ratings and auditsThe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which was created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, released its third annual report on audits of...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 26
This webcast will include discussions of recently issued, commonly-applicable Accounting Standards Updates for non-public, non-governmental entities.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.
Sep 9
In this session we'll discuss the types of technologies and their uses in a small accounting firm office.
Sep 11
This webcast will include discussions of commonly-applicable Clarified Auditing Standards for audits of non-public, non-governmental entities.