States quick to take advantage of new nexus non-rules

It was only a couple of weeks ago that we reported the U.S. Supreme Court had refused to hear two cases that would have addressed the issue of substantial economic presence in a state being enough to constitute nexus.

In Lanco, Inc. v. Director U.S. and FIA Card Services N.A. f/k/a MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Commissioner, U.S., NJ and West Virginia chose to apply income taxes on corporations that had no physical presence in the state. In Lanco, A Delaware-based company licenses trademarks to women's apparel stores in New Jersey. In MBNA, West Virginia took the position that the bank had an economic presence in the state through its credit card customers.

Other states are joining New Jersey and West Virginia with legislation supporting taxation without physical presence. In New Hampshire, a new law defines in-state business to include business with a "substantial economic presence" and permits the state to collect its business profits tax on such out-of-state companies doing business in the state. This provision of the New Hampshire law is effective July 1.

The new Michigan Business Tax, scheduled to become effective January 1, 2008, assesses companies doing business in Michigan with no physical presence in the state, earning more than $350,000 in revenue that can be attributed to sales in Michigan. The new tax replaces the Michigan Single Business Tax and provides incentives for in-state companies.

Senate Bill 1726 has been introduced in an effort to stop what might become a trend of states looking for new ways to assess taxes. The bill, known as the Business Activity Tax Simplification Act of 2007 (BATSA) would solidify an earlier Supreme Court ruling (Quill v. North Dakota), a benchmark ruling that has been the cornerstone of nexus decisions for more than a decade, by requiring physical presence for the application of all business activity taxes.

Related stories:

  • Senate fights back on recent Supreme Court nexus issue

  • Supreme Court inaction could change nexus rules

    You may like these other stories...

    Accounting group pushes back against retirement age scrutinyMichael Rapoport of the Wall Street Journal reported that the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) on Monday pushed back against federal regulators who are again...
    There's still time to take advantage of last-minute, tax-saving moves for dependency exemptions. For 2014, there are bigger dependency exemptions, as well as rules that, in some cases, are dauntingly complex.The 2014...
    Tesco accounting probe finds “inappropriate behavior” by staff – reportsClare Hutchison of Reuters wrote on Sunday that an investigation into a 250 million-pound ($402 million) profit overstatement at...

    Already a member? log in here.

    Upcoming CPE Webinars

    Oct 22This webinar will include discussions of important issues in AU-C 800, Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks.
    Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.
    Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.
    Nov 5Join CPA thought leader and peer reviewer Rob Cameron and learn ways to improve the outcome of your peer reviews while maximizing the value of your engagement workflow.