Representative Saxton Goes to Bat for Small Investors
The following article is provided courtesy of CCH, Inc.
The current method of taxing mutual funds investors is discriminatory, unfair and economically counterproductive, according to a new study released on April 23 by the Joint Economic Committee (JEC). The study, "The Taxation of Mutual Funds Investors, Saving and Investment," highlights a reported defect in the tax law that imposes capital gains taxes on mutual fund investors although their shares have plunged in value.
"This study shows the need to change the tax law so that it does not impose punitive taxes on ordinary middle-class taxpayers attempting to save for retirement, education, medical and other needs," said Rep. Jim Saxton, R- N.J., Joint Economic Committee Chairman. "This feature of the tax law is one of the worst examples of how our tax system is biased against personal saving and investment, and is literally economically counterproductive," he said.
Representative Saxton on January 3 introduced a bill (HR 168) in the House that would amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow individuals an exclusion from gross income for certain amounts of capital gains distributions from regulated investment companies.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.