NTEU President Says Workforce Reduction Bill Undermines Essential Government Services
by AccountingWEB on
By Deanna C. White
The leader of the nation's largest independent federal employees union this week called on members of Congress to reject legislation that proposes what she is calling an "ill-advised reduction of the federal workforce threatening vital government services."
On November 4, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform will consider a bill that will require a 10 percent reduction of the federal workforce by 2015.
Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) said H.R. 3029, sponsored by Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC), threatens vital government services the American people depend on – including the vital services Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees provide to tax preparers and their clients.
"This bill is simply wrongheaded, misguided and based on false assumptions," said Kelley. "Every day, federal employees guard our borders, protect our food supply, safeguard our nuclear plants, assist taxpayers, and complete critical tasks for the American people. This legislation undercuts their important work and endangers the public."
Just at the IRS, this bill would result in the loss of as many as 9,400 employees, Kelley said, which will translate into less assistance for taxpayers, delayed tax refunds, reduced ability crackdown on tax cheats, and the loss of critical revenue needed to address our national deficit and fund essential government services. And while claiming to restrict the shift of federal responsibilities to private contractors, Kelley said, the legislation actually includes an enormous loophole to move work into the hands of "costly, unaccountable and ineffective contractors."
Kelley said H.R. 3029 would only exacerbate the existing staff shortage at the IRS, noting the agency currently has 94,346 employees administering tax law and processing approximately 236 million complicated tax returns, down from 114,018 employees for 205 million returns in 1995.
On November 1, Kelley wrote a letter to the members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, asking them to reject H.R. 3029.
"[H.R. 3029] is based on the erroneous assumptions that the federal workforce is too large and that reducing staff will save the taxpayers' money. The bill is wrong on both counts, and will lead to a significant reduction in services to the taxpayers," Kelley wrote. "Furthermore, the bill's language purports to limit shifting work to private sector contractors, but there is a huge loophole that will not, in fact, prevent such a shift. Private contractors generally cost more, are less accountable, and are unable to do the work as well or as efficiently as federal workers."
In the letter, Kelley noted that the federal workforce is already significantly smaller that it was decades ago. In 1953, there was one federal worker for every 78 residents, while in 2009 there was only one for every 147 residents, according to Office of Personnel Management (OPM) data. Moreover, OPM reports there were 200,000 fewer non-postal executive branch employees in 2009 than in 1968.
She added that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) would have 6,000 fewer employees to handle national security duties; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would lose 1,250 employees who screen against food poisoning and drug fraud; and Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) would have 1,000 fewer staff to help inventors and small businesses.
"The fact is that federal employees touch our lives in innumerable ways, but this imprudent proposal disregards those contributions and ignores the negative consequences for the American people," Kelley said.
The NTEU president also pointed to the testimony of Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf, who warned of reduced levels of service and that job cuts will not contribute to additional cost reductions as agencies are already operating under caps that provide those savings. Additionally, Kelley warned that H.R. 3029 could actually cost money as it would allow work to be transferred to expensive contractors.
"While the bill claims to limit a shift to private contractors who account for an estimated 10.5 million jobs in the government's "hidden workforce," the bill's language is inadequate," Kelley wrote. "Under Sec. 2 (h), private contractors are offered an enormous loophole to allow new contracts when there is a claim of 'financial advantage.' This will allow agency heads to continue contracting out to expensive firms, a practice that has exploded since 2001."
NTEU represents more than 150,000 employees in 31 agencies and departments.
1 day 17 hours ago by claudilocks
1 week 14 hours ago by karenacoker