Indian tribes take issue with IRS interpretations

Indian tribal governments are urging Congress to enact legislation that would prohibit the IRS from interpreting the tax law in a way that limits the tax-exempt debt that Indian tribes can issue, claiming that such limitations put the tribes at a competitive disadvantage to state and local government, according to a report in public finance newsletter, The Bond Buyer.

Tribes claim that the IRS limitations require that tax-exempt bond status is only allowed if the proceeds from the bond issues go towards "essential government functions." Tribes attempting to use tax-exempt bond dollars for golf courses and convention centers are being told the bonds don't qualify for tax exempt status. Tribes compare their golf courses to municipal golf courses that are built by state and local governments with tax-exempt dollars.

Wayne A. Shammel, general counsel for the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, referred to the "disparity in treatment between tribes and the tax code and other governmental entities," in conversations with lawmakers, according to The Bond Buyer.

In a notice of proposed rulemaking in 2006, the IRS stated that an essential government function does not include non-municipal golf courses and thus the courses owned by the tribes should not qualify for tax-exempt financing, The Bond Buyer reports.

Senator Max Baucus (D-MN) is co-sponsoring legislation that would allow tribal governments to issue tax exempt bonds for facilities on tribal reservations that are used for essential government functions. Gaming property is not to be included in the definition of essential government functions.

In a related matter, the Agua Callente Band of Cahuilla Indians in Washington State is appealing an IRS ruling that disallowed the use of revenue from tax-exempt bonds for the renovation of a golf course and recreation center.

In disallowing the usage of tax-exempt monies, the IRS is taking the position that Indian tribes are building facilities for commercial purposes and those purposes prohibit the use of tax-exempt funds for construction and renovation.

Attorneys for the Indian tribes have suggested that the IRS is trying to distinguish between municipal golf courses that are used by members of the community and other golf courses that more likely attract tourists. Attorneys are suggesting that tourists have been known to use municipal golf courses, so that distinction doesn't make sense.

You may like these other stories...

The IRS could do a better job if it had more resources at its disposal. That is the essence of a new report released on April 21 by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).The GAO conducted the report to (1) analyze IRS...
In need of CPE credits? Well, if you are an enrolled agent or CPA, you could earn as much as 18 credits by attending one of five IRS Nationwide Tax Forums this summer.The IRS Nationwide Tax Forums are three-day events that...
Russia races to dodge sanctions by adapting law to FATCARussia is in a race against the clock to adapt its laws to the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and save its banks from financial sanctions, Peter Hobson of...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Apr 24
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA introduces you to a powerful but underutilized macro feature in Excel.
Apr 25
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations' revenues. It will include discussions of revenue recognition for cash and non-cash contributions as well as other revenues commonly received by non-profit organizations.
Apr 30
During the second session of a four-part series on Individual Leadership, the focus will be on time management- a critical success factor for effective leadership. Each person has 24 hours of time to spend each day; the key is making wise investments and knowing what investments yield the greatest return.
May 1
This material focuses on the principles of accounting for non-profit organizations’ expenses. It will include discussions of functional expense categories, accounting for functional expenses and allocations of joint costs.