Huge increase in refund anticipation loans in 2008
The number of taxpayers requesting Interim Results for the 2008 Filing Season. In the 2005 filing season, the IRS processed approximately 9.6 million returns with RAL indicators. Information is not currently available for the 2006 filing season, an IRS spokesman said.
Millions of taxpayers borrow against all or part of their expected refunds using a Refund Anticipation Loan, which is a short-term loan based on a taxpayer's expected income tax refund minus fees, preparation, finance, and filing charges, and is a contract between the taxpayer and a lender. Once the IRS processes the return, the amount of the actual refund is transferred to the bank or lender. The IRS is not involved in the contract, cannot grant or deny the loan, and cannot answer any questions about it.
In January, the Treasury Department and the IRS requested public comment on their concern that RALs and similar products may provide preparers with a financial incentive to take improper tax return positions in order to inflate refund claims inappropriately. In their Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) the agencies said they are considering a proposal that tax return preparers be prohibited from disclosing or using taxpayer return information for the purpose of selling products such as RALs and similar products. The 90-day comment period ended April 7, 2008.
David Williams, IRS director of electronic tax administration and refundable credits, told the Albany Business Review that the IRS wanted to know whether it should propose new tax regulations prohibiting tax preparers from sending client information to banks that provide the loans. He said this wouldn't prevent clients from taking their information directly to a bank or other entity that could grant a refund anticipation loan.
The IRS is also conducting an audit in 2008 to determine the effects that Refund Anticipation Loans have on taxpayers and tax administration. The agency will report the final results in August 2008.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.