Fear of Filing - Guest Article

by Julian Block

The law empowers and encourages the Internal Revenue Service to make life decidedly disagreeable for persons who intentionally fail to file their returns at tax time. The key federal statute is the Internal Revenue Code, which authorizes the imposition of severe sanctions, both criminal and civil, on those who fail to comply with our "voluntary" system.

First, consider the provisions for criminal offenses. The one most frequently invoked, Code Section 7203, makes willful failure to file a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of as much as $25,000 and a jail sentence of up to one year, or both, plus the costs of prosecution.

For more serious situations, the feds have the option to bring charges under Section 7201 for willful evasion. This offense is a felony, the punishment for which is a maximum fine of $100,000 and five years in prison, or both, plus prosecution costs.

Because of budget constraints and crowded court dockets, Uncle Sam subjects relatively few taxpayers to criminal prosecutions. So let's look next at what the IRS routinely does: slap nonfilers with civil penalties. Those severe, nondeductible penalties are in addition to nondeductible interest charges.

Under Section 6651, the IRS can exact a late-filing penalty -- generally, 5 percent of the balance due for each month, or part of a month, that a Form 1040 is overdue. The maximum penalty is 25 percent of the balance due (the amount that remains unpaid after subtractions for taxes previously paid through withholdings from wages and quarterly payments of estimated taxes).

An example: A balance due of $10,000 means a penalty of $500 a month and as much as $2,500 for a more-than-four-months-tardy return. The severity of the penalty escalates considerably when the IRS accumulates suffficient evidence to establish the late filing is due to fraud, in which event, the Section 6651 penalty jumps from 25 to 75 percent.

To escape responsibility for civil fraud penalties, taxpayers frequently contend that the first failure to file caused their later failures to file. How come? Because submitting returns for subsequent years would reveal their initial nonfiling to the IRS, which then would press criminal charges -- an argument that leaves the courts unmoved.

For instance, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to attach any significance to the underlying fear of a criminal prosecution. To do so, observed the court, would "open a Pandora's box of illusory defenses to the fraud penalty."

Besides the late-filing penalty, the IRS can assess a late-payment penalty, which, as a general rule, is one-half of 1 percent of the unpaid amount for each month, or part of a month, up to a maximum of 25 percent. However, when the IRS assesses penalties for both late filing and payment, one partly offsets the other.

On top of penalties for late filing and payment, you are liable for interest from April 15 on the balance due. Even worse, forget about any deduction for interest on overdue taxes. To further twist the knife, the IRS charges interest on the penalty for late filing, but not the one for late payment.


Offer These Kinds of Tax Ideas to Your Clients
This article was written by Julian Block, the author of AccountingWEB's Client Tax Guides - a series of six different tax guides that you can distribute to your clients as your own. Client Tax Guides are professionally written and have the in-depth content you need to keep your clients informed. And best of all, you can cut and paste from these Client Tax Guides in whole or in part and use them in your various communication vehicles.

Find out how Client Tax Guides can help you today.

You may like these other stories...

Renaissance avoided more than $6 billion tax, report saysThe Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said on Monday that a Renaissance Technologies LLC hedge fund’s investors probably avoided more than $6...
A new Gallup survey found that 58 percent of smokers in the United States see increased state and federal taxes on cigarettes as an act of unjust discrimination, while 39 percent believe the tax hikes are justified.The...
Liberal groups object to bill barring taxes on Internet accessThe Internet Tax Freedom Act hasn’t been a controversial bill. In fact, it’s so popular that senators are seeking to pair it up with a far more...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 23
We can’t deny a great divide exists between the expectations and workplace needs of Baby Boomers and Millennials. To create thriving organizational performance, we need to shift the way in which we groom future leaders.
Jul 24
In this presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA revisits the Excel feature you should be using, but probably aren't. The Table feature offers the ability to both boost the integrity of your spreadsheets, but reduce maintenance as well.
Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.