Court Sides with Coltec in Tax-Shelter Lawsuit

For the second time in two weeks, a federal court has handed the Internal Revenue Service a major setback in its fight against abusive tax shelters.

Coltec Industries Inc., which makes aircraft-landing systems, used a strategy that involved transferring a $375 million promissory note to a subsidiary that was set up to take on liabilities associated with asbestos litigation. Coltec sold stock in the subsidiary to banks and law firms handling the litigation, producing a huge loss.

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington ruled that Coltec deserved an $82.8 million refund, the Wall Street Journal reported. The decision by Judge Susan Braden said that the actions did not represent sham transactions, as the IRS had claimed. The IRS said that they lacked economic substance even though they technically followed the tax code.

Braden wrote that "where a taxpayer has satisfied all statutory requirements established by Congress, as Coltec did in this case, the use of the 'economic substance' doctrine to trump 'mere compliance with the code' would violate the separation of powers" clause of the U.S. Constitution.

If Braden's ruling stands, the “contingent liability” transactions that the IRS listed as abusive tax shelters may be negated.

The Justice Department hasn't decided whether to appeal. The ruling was similar to one involving Black & Decker, which will receive a $57 million refund after another federal judge ruled against the IRS.

Black & Decker used an accelerated contingent liability strategy, which allowed the company to immediately deduct costs in one year rather than over several years.

Coltec's tax strategy was devised by Arthur Andersen.

"This case emasculates the judicial economic substance doctrine and explicitly invites Congress to codify the doctrine," said Lawrence Hill, a partner at the New York law firm Dewey Ballantine LLP, which had represented Andersen.

You may like these other stories...

Starting in October, the IRS will send warning letters to tax return preparers who appear not to be complying with Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) due diligence requirements.Section 6695(g) of the Internal Revenue Code...
BKD LLP adds Illinois accounting firm Wolf & Co.Springfield, Missouri-based CPA and advisory firm BKD LLP and Chicago-based accounting firm Wolf & Co. have agreed to merge, the firms announced on Monday. Wolf will...
A new government report on Monday found that the IRS may not be completing the required research steps in collecting delinquent taxes before considering the cases “not collectible.”The Treasury Inspector General...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 9In this jam-packed presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA will give you a crash-course in creating spreadsheet-based dashboards.
Oct 15This webinar presents the requirements of AU-C 600, Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors).
Oct 21Kristen Rampe will share how to speak and write more effectively by understanding your own and your audience’s communication style.
Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.