Bush, House Weigh In on Revised Child Tax Credit
What started out as a rather benign adjustment to the recent tax legislation - a change in the Child Tax Credit to make it a refundable credit instead of a credit against existing taxes so that more lower-income families would receive money from the government - has turned into a political controversy, pitting the House Republicans against members of the Senate who passed a version of the bill last week.
The Senate bill affects this summer's scheduled tax rebate by making the $1,000 Child Tax Credit refundable and the scheduled $400 rebate payable to families even if they didn't pay income taxes in 2002.
House Republicans are interested in passing a similar bill but only if they can attach the revised Child Tax Credit to legislation that would make the new $1,000 Child Tax Credit permanent. Current law requires that the Child Tax Credit be reduced to $700 in 2005.
The Senate version of the bill would cost the government $10 billion over the two years it covers. The House bill would cost $100 billion over the next 10 years.
The White House is urging passage of at least the Senate version of the bill. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said President Bush is anxious to have this bill on his desk. "He wants to sign it," Mr. Fleischer said at a press briefing on Monday.
If either the House or Senate version of the bill becomes law, some changes to the previously posted rebate dates will occur. Depending on how the rebate to lower-income families will be disbursed, either the entire summer rebate program which was scheduled to launch on July 25 will be delayed a month, or the new rebates for lower-income families will be delayed until September.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.