AMT reform options include possible change in SALT deduction

Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Max Baucus (D-MT) have introduced legislation to completely repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax, without requiring any offset of tax revenue from another source. Other lawmakers are mulling the possibility of trading the revenue from the AMT for a change in another area of individual income tax that would result in replacing the AMT revenue.

The U.S. Senate Finance Committee, headed by Baucus and with Grassley as its top Republican member, began hearings this week focusing on the AMT issue with the resolve of at least providing a temporary patch to the looming AMT crisis, if not providing an actual cure.

The AMT was created to ensure that people earning more than $200,000 per year pay their fair share of taxes by limiting the amount of deductions and credits allowed against the income of these wealthy taxpayers. There is an AMT exemption that keeps lower income taxpayers from being subject to this tax. However, the exemption amount has not been adjusted for inflation.

In recent years, Congress has voted for a temporary patch to increase the exemption amount and allow certain credits so that middle income taxpayers are not affected by the AMT. In 2006, about four million taxpayers paid the AMT. The temporary patch for 2006 has expired, and no new patch was enacted for 2007. Without any legislation, it is predicted that about 23 million taxpayers will have to pay the AMT in 2007.

The Tax Policy Center, a joint venture between the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, suggests that for 2007, a family with $75,000 in income and four children will owe an extra $1,997 in federal income tax, and possibly owe penalties on that amount as well.

Toying with the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) seems to be a favorite talking point among some lawmakers who are looking for a way of making up revenue if the AMT is changed or repealed. Suggestions have included turning the SALT deduction into a credit, or doing away with the deduction altogether. Other options being considered include a four percent surtax on couples with incomes above $200,000 per year and on single taxpayers with income above $100,000 per year. Talk of a flat tax is also resurfacing.

You may like these other stories...

Renaissance avoided more than $6 billion tax, report saysThe Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said on Monday that a Renaissance Technologies LLC hedge fund’s investors probably avoided more than $6...
A new Gallup survey found that 58 percent of smokers in the United States see increased state and federal taxes on cigarettes as an act of unjust discrimination, while 39 percent believe the tax hikes are justified.The...
Liberal groups object to bill barring taxes on Internet accessThe Internet Tax Freedom Act hasn’t been a controversial bill. In fact, it’s so popular that senators are seeking to pair it up with a far more...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 23
We can’t deny a great divide exists between the expectations and workplace needs of Baby Boomers and Millennials. To create thriving organizational performance, we need to shift the way in which we groom future leaders.
Jul 24
In this presentation Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA revisits the Excel feature you should be using, but probably aren't. The Table feature offers the ability to both boost the integrity of your spreadsheets, but reduce maintenance as well.
Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.