Amazon, California reach agreement in sales tax battle

By AccountingWEB Staff

Lawmakers in California say they've reached a truce with Amazon in a contentious disagreement over whether the online bookseller should collect state sales tax. 

The deal involves Amazon dropping a referendum campaign to overturn a new California law that requires Internet retailers to collect sales tax if they have affiliates and subsidiaries in the state. In return, tax collection will be delayed for one year.
 
Amazon has argued that it must only collect state sales tax in states where it has a physical presence. Since it is based in Seattle, it collects taxes in Washington, for example. California's law, which is similar to others in New York and North Carolina, says the affiliates fit the definition of a physical presence or "nexus."
 
Affiliates are typically small businesses, such as a book review website that includes a link to Amazon, which provides a commission to the affiliate.
 
Amazon has not only ended affiliate relationships around the country and fought the battle in court to avoid taxes, but it spent more than $5 million on its referendum campaign, according to KUOW radio.
 
Affiliates have been hit hard, Rebecca Madigan told CalWatchdog.com. "We just completed a survey that found 35 percent of 25,000 affiliate businesses lost more than half their business," said Madigan, who is director of the Performance Marketing Association, a group of affiliates. "And 32 percent have moved out of California, or are planning on it. This is far greater devastation than we predicted."
 
A blogger on savings.com posted a "Dear John" letter to the state, saying "…we're no longer a good match for each other." It went on, "Ever since you and your new BFF—the Affiliate Nexus Tax—started hanging out, people just don't want to do as much business with us anymore." Amazon, Overstock, and others "have decided that it's not working with us (or 25,000 other California-based businesses) anymore."
 
Amazon has supported a uniform interstate sales tax law rather than the patchwork of laws enacted by each state. The deal gives Amazon a year to lobby Congress to act on the issue. If no federal law is enacted by July, Amazon will start collecting sales tax in California in September 2012.
 
An editorial in the San Jose Mercury News that supports the compromise, even though the writer said it "smells bad," concludes, "Amazon's strategy has been understandable. What business wouldn't want a nearly 10 percent price advantage over competitors? But it just wasn't right. Not here, and not anywhere in America. California is standing up. Now it's Congress' turn."
 
Related items:
 

You may like these other stories...

Camp Hopes Estate Tax Will Be on Its Way OutAn article in Bloomberg said that Republicans are considering voting this year to repeal the U.S. estate tax, according to House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (R.-Mich.). He...
Senate Takes Different Approach from House for Highway and Bridge FundEarlier this week, according to a New York Times article, the Senate agreed to fill the coffers of the fund that pays for highway and bridge repairs with...
There it stands, your client's 100-year-old, rickety, vermin-infested barn or former hotel or whatever the darn thing once was. And she's considering what to do with it. There are two words that can help her decide...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.
Aug 28
Excel spreadsheets are often akin to the American Wild West, where users can input anything they want into any worksheet cell. Excel's Data Validation feature allows you to restrict user inputs to selected choices, but there are many nuances to the feature that often trip users up.