AICPA Issues Interpretation of Statement on Tax Services
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has issued an exposure draft of a proposed interpretation of Statement on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS) No. 1, "Tax Return Positions," specifically emphasizing the tax accountant's role in the area of tax planning.
The SSTS statements are part of an ongoing process by the AICPA to set out enforceable standards that govern the conduct of AICPA members and explain the responsibilities that tax practitioners have to taxpayers, the public, government, and the profession as a whole. The interpretation just issued is a response to recent controversies over potentially abusive tax shelters.
Placing an emphasis on ethical standards, the proposed interpretation sets out specific recommendations for the tax practitioner that provide direction in the area of tax planning. Included in the steps that a practitioner should follow are recommendations to establish background facts, consider reasonableness of assumptions and representations, apply pertinent authorities to relevant facts, consider the existence of a business purpose or economic substance for the transaction, and arrive at a conclusion supported by authorities.
Much of the interpretation document is made up of illustrations of case studies with recommendations for how to resolve dilemmas. Such resolutions typically require the practitioner to make sure taxpayers are informed of risks, inform the taxpayer of disclosure requirements, and consider circumstances when it would not be appropriate for the practitioner to sign the tax return.
The AICPA is soliciting comments on the proposed interpretation prior to publication. Comments are due by April 30, 2003, and may be submitted by e-mail to email@example.com or by mail to:
Edward S. Karl
Tax Division, AICPA
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1081
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.