Supreme Court Protects IRAs in Bankruptcy Filings
If you are facing a bankruptcy proceeding, you can rest a little easier now that the Supreme Court has ruled your individual retirement accounts (IRAs) can't be seized.
The court's unanimous decision puts IRAs on the list with Social Security benefits, 401(k)s and pension as assets that may not be touched by creditors in a bankruptcy case.
However, President Bush has indicated his support for a bill working its way through Congress that would make it difficult for many people to declare bankruptcy, the Wall Street Journal reported.
With more than 1.6 million people filing for bankruptcy last year-double the number from a decade ago-consumer groups lauded the legislation, which will make it much tougher for middle-income Americans to erase their debts through bankruptcy, the Journal reported.
IRAs are apt to become more popular as a result of the ruling, which is good news for people with multiple creditors who worried about moving assets to IRAs after changing jobs or becoming self-employed, the Journal reported.
The Supreme Court unanimously voted to extend federal protection to IRAs:
- Until now, only employee-sponsored retirement plans were shielded from creditors under federal law.
- IRAs enjoyed protection under many states, but those laws varied. Because of that, many professionals were reluctant to roll over assets into these accounts from employer-sponsored plans.
- The court didn't address whether large IRAs would be fully protected, the Journal reported.
"By protecting IRAs from creditors in bankruptcy, this decision allows workers to preserve retirement savings when, after a job change, their circumstances force them into bankruptcy," Jean Constantine-Davis, a senior attorney for AARP, told the Journal.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.