Report Says Auditing Review Process Lacks Discipline
In the second of a series of two articles about the accounting profession, The Washington Post staff writers investigate the disciplinary process in place in the accounting profession.
The reporters examined hundreds of cases of disciplinary action against accountants and found, for the most part, that accountants rarely face public accountability. "The deterrent effect that's necessary is just not there," according to Douglas R. Carmichael, a professor of accountancy at City University of New York's Baruch College. That "makes investing like Russian roulette."
The layers of discipline facing accountants who are accused of overlooking or covering up include sanctions by the SEC, expulsion from the AICPA, and revocation of licenses by state accountancy boards. In reality, the manpower to effectively implement disciplinary procedures is small, and only the most egregious examples of auditing abuse result in action against the auditors, according to the report.
The previous article in the series addressed the role of accountants as public watchdogs.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.