Moody's, S&P Ask Companies To Disclose Rating 'Triggers'
Faced with the prospect of increased scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s said yesterday they have expanded the types of information requested from companies.
Both agencies are now asking companies to disclose rating “triggers.” These are clauses in agreements that can adversely affect a company's liquidity if and when the company's rating is downgraded, (e.g., by forcing it to pay off debt or pay a higher interest rate.) “We've called for greater public disclosure of these contingent arrangements,” said Clifford Griep, Standard & Poor's chief credit officer. “Their usage has become so common that there is a need to incorporate triggers in the rating process.”
Moody's spokeswoman Fran Laserson said, “We've communicated with all of our corporate clients and asked them to identify rating triggers in financial agreements, operating agreements, indentures and other legal obligations. Rating triggers can have unintended and highly disruptive consequences for both borrowers and lenders.”
The other leading U.S. rating agency, Fitch Ratings, is also contemplating changes. “Like all market participants, we have become increasingly concerned about the inadequacy of disclosure regarding off-balance [sheet] and other forms of contingent liabilities,” said spokesman Jim Jockle. “We are currently exploring a variety of ways to increase access to this information.”
Earlier this week, SEC Chairman Harvey Pitt told Congress, “We're looking at how rating agencies perform. They have enormous impact on the stock market, and yet they're essentially totally unregulated.” The rating agencies were faulted for failing to alert investors and analysts to factors that contributed to the Enron collapse.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.