Homestore.com Trips on Barter Accounting; Who's Next?
U.S. retail and property service Homestore.com joins the list of companies investigating possible accounting irregularities. In a recently-filed Form 8-K, the company said that it expects to restate its nine-month financial results and reduce the revenue figure by as much as $95 million to better reflect the nature of on-line advertising transactions that should have been accounted for as barter transactions. The company says it erred in recognizing revenues for on-line ads that were related to purchases of goods and services from third parties.
Homestore.com is not alone in facing a slew of knotty New-Age revenue recognition problems. Dot-coms face complex accounting issues that include not only barter transactions, but also issues of gross vs. net revenues, how to handle multiple revenue arrangements where there is more than one product, whether to record shipping and handling fees as revenues rather than expense recoveries, and how to record coupons, rebates and other sales incentives – just to name a few.
The dot-com accounting issues do not reflect a lack of attention by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force has been addressing many of these issues over the past couple of years. Some issues have been resolved; others are still under consideration. But the troublesome nature of the issues has some critics calling for a broader project on revenue recognition. "The Board is considering whether to undertake a major revenue recognition project," explains Todd Johnson, the FASB project manager handling the proposal for the potential project. "At its January 9, 2002 meeting, the Board will discuss whether to issue for public comment a proposal to undertake such a project."
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.