Health care costs daunting for new retirees
With the oldest baby boomers turning 62 – that magic age when they can start collecting Social Security checks – the call to retire grows stronger.
A new study suggests they might want to ignore that voice in their heads. For one thing, Social Security checks are at least 25 percent smaller than if recipients wait until full retirement age to start collecting. And Fidelity Investments estimates that it would cost $225,000 to cover medical costs through retirement for a couple, aged 65, who retires this year. Retiring younger would raise that figure even higher.
Fidelity said in its report that the $225,000 figure is a 4.7 percent increase over Fidelity's 2007 estimate. The total increase is 41 percent since 2002, when Fidelity first issued its estimate.
"A lot of people don't realize that Medicare doesn't kick in until age 65," Bryan D. Beatty, a fee-based asset manager in Vienna, VA, told the Associated Press. Bridging the gap in coverage between 62 and 65 can be expensive, he said.
The Fidelity figure assumes that the couple doesn't have employer-sponsored retiree health care coverage and that the man would live for another 17 years while the woman would live for 20. The estimate also includes expenses connected with Medicare Part B and D premiums, cost-sharing provisions, co-payments, co-insurance, deductibles, and prescription drug out-of-pocket costs.
"With health care costs continuing to outpace wage increases and companies trimming retiree health benefits, financing health care has to be central to retirement planning," Brad Kimler, Fidelity executive vice president, said in a statement. "Given current economic conditions, this is especially true for those planning to retire in the next few years or before they qualify for full Social Security or Medicare benefits."
Ray Ferrara, a certified financial planner in Clearwater, FL, told the St. Petersburg Times that Fidelity's estimate may be low. He said recent studies show that the average 55-year-old has set aside less than $65,000 for retirement, which brings up bigger political issues.
"Those who don't have $225,000 are going to fall back on the government and society to take care of them," he said. "The solution is to cut benefits, raise Medicare deductibles or increase taxes. But those are not the kinds of things politicians want to tackle."
In fact, the Center for Retirement Research has estimated that 61 percent of households will not be able to maintain their standard of living in retirement because of medical costs, the Myrtle Beach Sun News reported. The estimate is based on cost projections from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and current savings trends.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.