First whisteblower unprotected by SOX
The Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board has ruled that a whistleblower's accusations were not protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower protection provision, CFO.com reports.
David Welch, former CFO of Virginia bank Cardinal Bancshares, in 2004 was the first person to win whistleblower protection under SOX. Welch said the bank fired him after he raised questions about the bank's accounting policies and internal controls. In June 2006, a Labor Department judge ordered that the bank reinstate him and restore pay and benefits.
The bank appealed, leading to this most recent ruling by the Labor Department's appeals board.
According to CFO.com, "the appeals board countermanded Welch's contentions...reasoning that some of his charges were not protected under Sarbanes-Oxley, as the administrative law judge had opined."
The board's May 31 ruling states: "We reverse the ALJ's conclusion that Cardinal violated the SOX because, as a matter of law, he erred in concluding that Welch engaged in SOX-protected activity. Welch's concerns that Cardinal misclassified the loan recoveries and consequently misled investors do not constitute protected activity because Welch could not have reasonably believed that Cardinal misstated its financial condition. Likewise, Welch's complaints about access to Larrowe & Co. and about Cardinal's internal accounting controls are not SOX-protected activity because they do not relate to the federal securities laws. Therefore, since Welch has not demonstrated that he engaged in protected activity, an essential element of his case, we DENY his complaint."
The case has been in litigation for more than four years, during which time Welch has not found another job in accounting. But he will soon become a member of Franklin University's full-time teaching staff, where he will help establish an ethics and forensics program.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.