White House Cautions Agencies About Hiring Andersen
The Bush administration has issued a letter to federal agencies to carefully determine whether business practices and ethics are sufficient before hiring Big Five firm Andersen or Enron Corp. to perform government services. While not specifically asking agencies to choose different companies, Mitchell Daniels, director of the government Office of management and budget cautioned the General Services Administration and nine other federal agencies to refer to the government's ethics and integrity requirements before awarding future contracts to either Andersen or Enron.
"Consideration should be given to the initiation of suspension or debarment treatment for all, or part of, Arthur Andersen or Enron as appropriate," said Mr. Daniels. Suspension is temporary, disbarment is for "a reasonable period," according to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Andersen currently performs services on 64 federal government contracts worth $24.7 million.
Meanwhile, Andersen's UK managing partner, John Ormerod, has issued a letter to Andersen's UK clients stating that his firm should not be blamed for the failure of Enron. "We've been in business here in Britain for half a century. Our 500 partners and 5,500 other staff here are proud of their work and determined to defend our long-established reputation for professional competence and integrity."
The letter continues, "Much of the comment in the press focused on US accounting standards. In the UK, of course, there are different accounting standards. Our current practices and policies are robust and should not cause you, or your shareholders, any concern."
You can read the full text of Mr. Ormerod's letter.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.