Trucking Company is Seeking Permission to Sue E&Y Over Merger
Swift Transportation Co. Inc. is seeking court permission to sue its former accounting firm for an “erroneous audit report” of a company it merged with in 2001.
Swift said in court documents that it relied on a “fraudulent” audit, resulting in damages of more than $100 million, according to the Arizona Republic. "As a result of E&Y's wrongful conduct, Swift concluded a merger with M.S. Carriers that it otherwise would not have consummated," Swift said in court records. The company also said it paid at least $44 million too much in the $380 million deal.
The lawsuit accuses Ernst & Young of inflating M.S. Carriers' investment in Transportes EASO, which was once Mexico's largest truckload carrier. Swift considered M.S. Carriers' 50 percent interest in the company to be “strategically important.”
Ernst & Young's audit said that M.S. Carriers recognized $1 million from EASO in 2000, the newspaper reported. EASO in fact had no income that year, and the company asked Swift for a $2 million loan weeks after the merger. Swift agreed.
Ernst & Young, for its part, said the lawsuit stems from an “unhappy merger” between the two trucking companies. The firm says that a contract with M.S. Carriers and Swift, the eventual parent company, stated that legal disputes must be settled through arbitration and not in the courtroom. A Superior Court judge ruled in Ernst & Young's favor in June, but Phoenix-based Swift took the case to the Arizona Court of Appeals.
Swift is the biggest U.S. long-haul trucking company, which more than doubled its fleet of trucks through the 2001 merger. Earnings dropped sharply that year, but the company has been profitable in each of the last three years. Swift's earnings improved by 119 percent last year, the company said.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.