Tax Advisers Lose Another Layer of Client-Adviser Privilege
In the continuing battle between tax advisers and the IRS regarding turning over taxpayer records of those involved in tax shelters, it seems the advisers are losing. A federal appeals court ruled yesterday that BDO Seidman must turn over the names of clients who purchased certain tax shelters from the firm.
BDO has been embroiled in a privacy-based legal battle with the IRS for over a year. "BDO Seidman and the IRS disagree as to what documentation the service is entitled to under the law," said a BDO spokesman last summer.
Several rulings and appeals led up to yesterday's decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which covers Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana.
The panel cited a finding in the tax code that fundamentally requires BDO to have kept records and report to the IRS the names of those who invested in tax shelters.
Legal observers agree that this move is a big blow to privacy advocates who want to keep the nature of communications between advisers and their clients just that - private.
"I don't think that investors are going to be able to hide behind some kind of privilege," Elliott H. Kajan, a tax lawyer at Kajan Mather & Barish in Los Angeles, told the New York Times.
Lee Sheppard, a writer for Tax Notes, said the BDO decision "means that if you filed a tax return with a tax shelter then your name is not a secret any more and you have no reason to believe that the guys who sold you the tax shelter will keep it secret." She continued, "The fact that there is no confidentiality to what you put on a tax return" is a big victory for the government.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.