Lieberman on Andersen: 'Enron Episode May End This Company's History'
Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, one of the several government agencies investigating the Andersen/Enron affair, appeared on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday, and described what he said may be criminal activity on the part of Big Five firm Andersen.
"We know that Arthur Andersen, the supposedly independent auditor, covered up facts very relevant to the condition of Enron," said Sen. Lieberman. "Arthur Andersen is a great company with a great name. That name is being sullied and ultimately this Enron episode may end this company's history."
On Sunday, Time Magazine released a story in which it described a memo that went out to Andersen employees on October 12, just four days before Enron disclosed its $618 million loss which paved the way for the energy giant's spiral downward into bankruptcy proceedings. The Andersen memo directed workers to destroy all audit material relating to Enron, except for the most basic "work papers."
The article went on to state that supervisors at Andersen reminded their employees of the order to destroy documents several times in the weeks leading up to the formal investigation that was launched by the Securities and Exchange Commission in November. It has not been determined if orders to destroy documents at Andersen continued after SEC subpoenas were issued.
Echoing Sen. Lieberman's comments, J. Edward Ketz, associate professor and director of the M.B.A. program at Pennsylvania State University was quoted in the New York Times as saying, "Things look very bleak for Andersen. There's a chance that they could go under on this one."
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.