Law Firm to Pay $81.55 Million to Settle Tax Shelter Claims

The national law firm of Jenkens & Gilchrist, PC, has agreed to pay $81.55 million in a class action settlement to resolve claims against the firm related to its tax shelter work. This week's settlement concludes negotiations that took over 14 months to complete and represents two significant modifications to the initial settlement, reached in April 2004.


AccountingWEB is pleased to bring you tools that can help systematize the accounting department of a small company, corporate business or a public accounting firm. Over 200 accounting department policy templates, written in Microsoft Word format by PolicySoft, are available individually or in groups for immediate download.

Accounts Payable General Accounting Department
Accounts Receivable General Ledger
Credit & Collections Payroll
Fixed Assets Shipping & Receiving

The $81.55 million settlement represents a $6.55 million increase from the initial settlement. In addition, under the terms of the final settlement, Jenkens & Gilchrist has agreed to settle with the Class even though a number of individuals elected to opt out of the settlement. Under the initial settlement, Jenkens & Gilchrist retained the right to terminate the settlement if any Class Member elected to opt out of the settlement. Thus, the law firm's decision to finalize the settlement with the existence of opt outs represents a significant concession.

According to lead counsel David Deary, a partner with Deary Montgomery DeFeo & Canada, LLP, the terms of the final settlement result in more money for the Class and less Class Members participating in the settlement. On April 28, 2004, Jenkens & Gilchrist initially agreed to pay $75 million to the Class. A New York federal court preliminarily approved the $75 million settlement on May 14, 2004.

According to Mr. Deary, the $81.55 million settlement with Jenkens is a major victory for the class of plaintiffs. "This settlement provides Class Members with a substantial recovery from Jenkens & Gilchrist in light of the law firm's circumstances," says Mr. Deary. According to Mr. Deary, the Jenkens & Gilchrist settlement has provided his clients and Class Members with crucial information on the role other accounting firms, law firms, and investment firms played in promoting, selling, and implementing tax strategies to the Class Members. Mr. Deary says, "The information we received from Jenkens & Gilchrist as part of the settlement has undoubtedly strengthened our clients' claims against others who were integral players in the scheme. As a result of this settlement, our clients possess a tremendous amount of ammunition against the other defendants. Our clients' claims against the other defendants are now backed by very powerful, irrefutable evidence. This information can't be measured by any amount of money."

The initial settlement reached with Jenkens & Gilchrist in April 2004, was well received by Class Members. Over 90% of Class Members elected to participate in the settlement. As of today, a substantial number of Class Members who initially elected to opt out of the class settlement have retracted their opt out status, and are now electing to participate in the settlement. Mr. Deary states, "It is clear that Class Members believe this settlement is in their best interest and support the settlement."

Today's settlement stems from two class action suits filed by Mr. Deary and his trial team in federal courts in New York. Mr. Deary and his trial team currently represent approximately 300 individuals and have filed 18 lawsuits across the country, seeking hundreds of millions of dollars from numerous well-known accounting firms, law firms, and investment firms, who designed, promoted, sold, and implemented "bogus" tax shelters to their long- time trusting clients. Mr. Deary and his team's clients will continue to vigorously pursue claims against, among others, accounting giants Ernst & Young, BDO Seidman, Grant Thornton, and KPMG, banking giant Bank One, law firms Sidley Austin Brown & Wood and Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn, financial firms Lincoln Financial and American Express, and investment firms such as the German-based worldwide investment banking firm Deutsche Bank, and others.

"Our clients are now focused squarely on a substantial number of other major players who have significant exposure and deeper pockets than Jenkens & Gilchrist," says co- class counsel Joe Whatley.

According to Ernest Cory, co-class counsel, "Slowly but surely our clients' trusted advisors will be forced to accept responsibility and be held accountable. We will not stop until we win." Today's settlement is set for a final hearing on January 24, 2005.

Source: Deary Montgomery DeFeo & Canada, LLP

You may like these other stories...

School tax breaks get House support as Democrats objectRichard Rubin of Bloomberg reported that the House of Representatives on Thursday voted to expand and simplify tax breaks for education as Republicans continue to pass...
Many senior US tax professionals believe that a streamlined audit process will be the top benefit resulting from the IRS Transfer Pricing Audit Roadmap, a new toolkit organized around a notional 24-month audit timeline,...
Tax accounting to be simplified for money-market fundsThe US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 3-2 on Wednesday for sweeping changes to institutional money-market funds, Emily Chasan, senior editor of...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.