Grant Thornton to Fight Claim of “Reckless” Audit
Grant Thornton LLP said it will challenge recent Treasury Department (DoT) findings and penalties stemming from the firm’s audit of a bank that collapsed in 1999.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Treasury agency that regulates nationally chartered banks, on Friday announced the telling $300,000 fine against the Chicago-based CPA firm that audited First National Bank of Keystone in 1998.
Regulators closed the West Virginia bank after findings of fraud, in what the government describes as the costliest U.S. bank failure of the past decade.
Treasury’s announcement said that Grant Thornton “participated in an unsafe or unsound practice by recklessly failing to comply with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) in planning and conducting an audit of Keystone’s 1998 financial statements in the context of a maximum risk audit.”
Among his findings, the Comptroller of the Currency, John Dugan, noted that Grant Thornton ignored “unequivocal, written evidence” that nearly 25 percent of the bank’s assets could not be accounted for, the agency said.
The $300,000 fine, while a small expense to a large firm, is a big statement by the comptroller's office, which rarely fines accounting firms.
Grant Thornton said it will appeal the ruling to federal court, noting that an administrative law judge at the agency had previously recommended dismissal of the enforcement action.
"We are disappointed that the OCC ignored the recommendations of its own administrative law judge," Grant Thornton said in a public statement.
The Keystone collapse cost the federal bank insurance fund an estimated $563 million. Regulators closed the bank in 1999. Among the governments allegations of fraud was $515 million in loans still on the books after they had been sold. The bank had bought high-risk loans and bundled them into securities.
Certain bank executives tried to conceal the resulting losses from federal auditors, even burying bank records in the ground. A few executives served prison terms for obstructing a federal bank examination, mail fraud and conspiracy.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.