Firm Settles Two Class-Action Lawsuits over Tax Shelters
One of the biggest law firms in Dallas has agreed to pay $75 million to about 100 former clients who claim the firm designed and sold tax shelters that were rejected by the IRS.
The firm, Jenkens & Gilchrist, issued a statement Friday saying the settlement "does not indicate we agree with any of the plaintiffs’ claims," and calling it "a sound business decision." The agreement, involving two class-action suits filed in 2002 and 2003, still needs court approval.
"Suffice it to say there's hundreds of millions of dollars in fees paid to people, and that doesn't include penalties" levied by the IRS, said attorney David Deary, whose firm represents about 100 of the class-action plaintiffs. He told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that all his clients are individuals "who had sold a business or had a large capital gain" and were told that they could shelter their gains from federal income taxes using six or seven different strategies.
"The bottom line is, the IRS's position is that none of these strategies had a business or economic purpose," but rather were purely designed to avoid taxes, Deary said. The Dallas Business Journal reported that Shore Deary is also pursuing legal action against Wachovia Corp./First Union Corp., Ernst & Young LLP, KPMG LLP and others over the allegedly faulty tax strategies.
Jenkens & Gilchrist Chairman Tom Cantrill said in a prepared statement that "we continue to believe the legal advice provided to our clients accurately reflected the state of the tax laws at the time it was provided." He said the firm is confident that it "will also be able to resolve all outstanding issues such as the government's demand for privileged information."
Cantrill was referring to the Justice Department’s legal attempts to force the firm to follow a summons issued by the IRS that seeks the identities of its tax-shelter clients. The tax code requires promoters of abusive tax shelters to keep investor lists and turn over those lists to the IRS if asked.
The firm contends the names are protected by attorney-client privilege, but the New York Times reported last week that the Justice Department asked the courts to suspend attorney-client confidentiality because the firm engaged in fraud.
The IRS believes Paul Daugerdas, a Jenkens & Gilchrist partner operating out of Chicago, was behind questionable shelters used by more than 600 people.
One Jenkens & Gilchrist client was Indiana millionaire Henry Camferdam Jr., who claims he paid a total of $7 million in 1999, including several million dollars to the law firm, for a tax shelter that the firm said would legally shield $70 million in profits from taxes, the New York Times reported. The IRS, however, ruled the shelter was not legitimate and Camferdam is being audited by the IRS for his 1999 return.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.