E&Y to Pay $125M to Settle Claims Over Failed Illinois Bank
Ernst & Young LLP will pay $125 million to settle claims stemming from its involvement in the failure of an Illinois savings bank, according to a consent order with the Office of Thrift Supervision.
|Accounts Payable||General Accounting Department|
|Accounts Receivable||General Ledger|
|Credit & Collections||Payroll|
|Fixed Assets||Shipping & Receiving|
The Big Four accounting firm will pay $85 million to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which served as receiver for the failed Superior Bank FSB of Hinsdale, Ill., Reuters reported. Ernst & Young, which audited the bank, will also pay $40 million in restitution to the FDIC.
The Office of Thrift Supervision, or OTS, closed Superior in 2001, saying the thrift had become "critically undercapitalized, largely due to incorrect accounting treatment and aggressive assumptions in its valuation of residual assets in the securitization of subprime mortgage loans."
In December of 2001, Superior Bank's owners agreed to pay the FDIC $460 million over 15 years to settle any potential claims. When the bank failed, it had about $2 billion in assets.
Ernst & Young said it has already made changes to the way it audits savings and loan associations to comply with the OTS consent order, and is implementing the changes throughout its entire bank audit practice. The changes include dedicating more technical resources to the practice and strengthening "our client acceptance and reacceptance procedures," spokesman Charles Perkins told Reuters in New York.
Ernst & Young did not admit or deny that its audits in the Superior Bank case failed to comply with any professional accounting standards. The firm said it was settling to cooperate with regulators and to ensure the firm had “the strongest policies and procedures to serve our clients and the public interest."
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.