BDO Seidman's Clients Try to Rescue Accounting Firms
Last month, the Chicago-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that accounting firms cannot hide behind the cloak of client privilege and must disclose information to the Internal Revenue Service about participation in certain types tax shelters that are considered to be abusive. Now, approximately 100 clients of BDO Seidman, the world's fifth-largest accounting firm, have asked the court to reconsider that ruling.
BDO's clients are represented by Steven Brown, a partner with the Chicago law firm of Martin Brown & Sullivan. Mr. Brown, a former attorney with the Internal Revenue Service, noted the concern that is shared by many accounting professionals should the ruling stand. "If it's well-known that a firm represents people in any area, from antitrust to white-collar crime, then the government could ask for a list of their clients."
Mr. Brown has hinted that there is a good chance this case may make it to the Supreme Court, no matter how the appellate court responds to the request to rehear the ruling that BDO must turn over its tax shelter client lists to the IRS. That won't help BDO, however, should the ruling go against them. "We'll take it as far as we can," said Mr. Brown, "but the case effectively ends when the stay is lifted."
Earlier this year PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Merrill Lynch & Co., and Ernst & Young LLP each reached settlements with the IRS over the issue of marketing and selling abusive tax shelters. Other cases are currently pending against now defunct Arthur Andersen LLP, KPMG LLP, and the Texas-based law firm Jenkens & Gilchrist P.C.
The appeals court is expected to make a decision before Labor Day.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.