Financial Planners Sue SEC Over Lax Standards for Stock Brokers

The largest professional association for financial planners sued the Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday to force stock brokers to be held to the same standards as financial planners.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) contends that stock brokers who act as financial planners should not be exempt from the fiduciary duties and disclosure rules required by the federal Investment Advisers Act, reported.

"The SEC has given brokers a wholesale exemption from the Advisers Act that Congress never intended," said Barbara Roper of the Consumer Federation of America, which supports the lawsuit. "The recent mutual fund scandals provide ample evidence of the enormous gap between the advisory image brokers promote and the seamy reality of their conduct.”

Financial planners must place the client’s interest above their own, ensure that investments are suitable and provide complete disclosure about their services, pay and any conflicts of interest.

Stock brokers have not been required to follow those standards because the SEC in 1999 proposed that brokers operate under less-stringent Exchange Act rules, which allow brokers to forgo commissions and be paid for advisory services even though they aren’t investment advisers. The SEC sent the proposal out for comment, but never acted on it, promising no enforcement until it was finalized. That led brokers to act as if the rule is in effect, financial planners say.

"Clearly, consumers, financial planners and compliance professionals still do not know what the SEC meant under the rule proposal," said FPA President Elizabeth Jetton, in a prepared statement. "However, instead of attempting to define a difficult legal concept, we believe the public would be better served by requiring brokers to operate under the higher standards of investor protection afforded by the Advisers Act."

She said the FPA will argue in court that the SEC violated the intent of the federal Administrative Procedures Act by failing to complete its rulemaking process in a timely manner, and for misinterpreting its authority under the Advisers Act in crafting a new exemption.

"For nearly five years the SEC has permitted brokerage firms to comply with a rule that was never adopted,” Jetton said. “We believe that at a minimum, the SEC should comply with the rules under which federal regulations are adopted and to act promptly by withdrawing a poorly conceived regulation."

You may like these other stories...

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has chosen a former partner and vice chairman with Deloitte LLP as its new chief accountant.James Schnurr, who specialized in financial and SEC reporting for public companies...
Summer is a time for kicking back and playing a few round of golf with friends, for example. But if you're on the green, you'd better be careful: The SEC may be looking over your shoulder.In July, the SEC announced...
An examination initiative launched by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier this week will enable the agency to evaluate whether municipal advisors are complying with new SEC rules that went into effect...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 21Kristen Rampe will share how to speak and write more effectively by understanding your own and your audience’s communication style.
Oct 22This webinar will include discussions of important issues in AU-C 800, Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks.
Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.
Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.