Fight to Ban ATM Fees Loses Ground
The ban on ATM fees that went into effect last year in San Francisco attempted to prevent what was considered to be "double-dipping" by banks who charged non-members a fee for the consumer's bank as well as a fee for the bank providing the ATM service.
A U.S. District Court ruled that the ban on fees violated federal laws which provide banks with the right to charge the access fees. Lawyers representing the San Francisco voters vow to take the case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has previously ruled that states have the right to regulate ATMs.
Fees currently being charged by the banks are being held in escrow in the possible event that a future court decision will rule against the fee structure.
Although the banks have won this round, the case may have far reaching effects on a national level as it makes its way through the court system.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.