FASB Finds Terrorist Costs Not Extraordinary
Costs and expenses from the September terrorist attack on the U.S. are not to be treated as an extraordinary item, a task force from the Financial Accounting Standards Board has ruled.
The decision was made in light of the prevailing economic conditions before the disaster. Task force member Dick Stock reportedly said that the downturn leading up to the atrocity, and the fact that the attack affected virtually every business, made the event "almost ordinary."
Earlier draft statements from FASB had come to the opposite conclusion. But a heated debate on the issues on Friday led to the belief that the Emerging Issues Task Force's (EITF) original interpretation of "extraordinary" was not applicable, after the problem became too complex to solve.
FASB stated: "At Friday's meeting the Task Force concluded that, while the events of September 11 were certainly extraordinary, the financial reporting treatment that uses that label would not be an effective way to communicate the financial effects of those events and should not be used in this case.
"The EITF observed that the economic effects of the events were so extensive and pervasive that it would be impossible to capture them in any one financial statement line item. Any approach to extraordinary item accounting would include only a part, perhaps a relatively small part, of the real effect. Readers of financial reports will be intensely interested in understanding the whole impact of the events on each company.
"The EITF concluded that showing part of the effect as an 'extraordinary item' would hinder, rather than help, effective communication."
Under the ruling, companies will have to register costs and expenses incurred as a result of the attack as part of normal business operations.
The decision is effective immediately. A copy of the decision will shortly be available on the FASB website. The original draft statement is available now.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.