New Survey of Workplace Ethics Shows Surprising Results

By Curtis C. Verschoor, CMA
 
Findings from a survey of ethics in the workplace may portend a future downward shift in business ethics. The percentage of companies with a weak ethical culture is on the rise, as is the number of employees who experienced retaliation for blowing the whistle on observed misconduct.
 
The ethical culture of the US workplace is in transition, according to the 2011 National Business Ethics Survey (NBES) published by the Washington, DC‒based Ethics Resource Center (ERC). ERC is a private nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and the advancement of high ethical standards and practices in public and private organizations. Subtitled "Workplace Ethics in Transition," this seventh biannual study by the ERC is based on responses from nearly 4,700 employees at all levels, working at least twenty hours per week in the for-profit sector. Responses came from interviews conducted online and over the telephone. Data was weighted for gender, age, and education.
 
Some of the study results are easily understandable, but others are unexpected and surprising. ERC calls the news both "very good" and "very troubling," saying that the findings, "which are unlike any the ERC has seen in its prior surveys, indicate something is driving a shift in the American workplace." According to ERC President Patricia Harned, "While most US workers are currently 'doing the right thing' by following company standards and reporting wrongdoing when they see it, we see trouble ahead." She adds that the 2011 results show "factors that historically indicate that American business may be on the cusp of a large downward shift in ethical conduct."
 
The state of the economy has always been one of the major causes of workplace misbehavior ‒ companies behave differently during economic difficulties. Because of management actions, employees perceive a heightened commitment to ethics during hard times and adopt a higher standard of behavior. Since job security is low during a downturn, employees tend to be more careful to avoid making mistakes. Consequently, only 45 percent of US workers report witnessing actual misconduct ‒ an historic, if still somewhat troubling, low. The five most frequently observed misconduct events were misuse of company time (33 percent), abusive behavior (21 percent), company resource abuse (20 percent), lying to employees (20 percent), and violating corporate Internet use policies (16 percent).
 
The proportion of employees who observed misconduct and then decided to report it climbed to a record high of 65 percent. The willingness of employees to say something about what they saw depended significantly on the nature of the violation. The highest proportion of reported violations involved stealing or improper payment offers to public officials ‒ nearly 70 percent of workers who witnessed such actions reported the violations. Similarly, almost two-thirds of employees reported improper use of competitors' inside information, the falsification of expense reports, trading on inside information, making improper political contributions, delivery of goods or services that failed to meet specifications, abusive behavior or behavior that creates a hostile work environment, and the falsification and/or manipulation of financial reporting information.
 
On the low reporting side, only 43 percent of employees who witnessed violations of company Internet use policies reported it, and only half reported the inappropriate use of social networking they observed.
 
In terms of where employees report observed misconduct, supervisors remain the most likely recipient, at 56 percent. Company hotlines receive only 5 percent of misconduct reports and external parties only 3 percent.
 
Some of the actions that companies have taken to reduce the level of misbehavior and increase the reporting of violations include heightened efforts to raise awareness of ethics (42 percent) and management watching employee actions more closely (34 percent). Forty-four percent of employees believe their business is taking fewer risks, and 30 percent agree that the bad actors in their company are just lying low because of the recession.
 
Clouding this better news are the "ominous warning signs of a potentially significant ethics decline ahead." The percentage of employees who experienced some form of retaliation for blowing the whistle was 22 percent, an all-time high. This compares with 15 percent in 2009 and 12 percent in 2007. The proportion of respondents who felt they couldn't question management without fear of retaliation amounted to 19 percent of all employees.
 
Many of the retaliatory actions were severe:
  • Excluded from decisions and work activity by supervisor or management (64 percent).
  • Given a cold shoulder by other employees (62 percent).
  • Verbally abused by supervisor or someone else in management (62 percent).
  • Almost lost job (56 percent).
  • Not given promotions or raises (55 percent).
  • Verbally abused by other employees (51 percent).
  • Hours or pay were cut (46 percent).
  • Relocated or reassigned (44 percent).
  • Demoted (32 percent).
  • Experienced online harassment (31 percent).
  • Experienced physical harm to their person or property (31 percent).
  • Harassed at home (29 percent).
Further, the NBES reported the percentage of employees who perceived pressure to compromise their company's ethical standards, or even break the law so they could perform their jobs, jumped significantly from 8 percent in 2009 to 13 percent in 2011. This is the highest level since 2000.
 
Another worrisome finding was that the share of companies that employees reported as having a weak ethical culture climbed to a near-record level of 42 percent, up from 35 percent in the previous survey two years ago. The NBES measures critical aspects of ethics culture, including management's trustworthiness, whether managers at all levels talk about ethics and model appropriate behavior, and the extent to which employees value and support ethical conduct, accountability, and transparency.
 
As expected, there's a very strong correlation between a strong ethical culture and lower observed misconduct. Misconduct was observed in only 29 percent of companies with a strong ethical culture but seen in 90 percent of those with a weak ethical culture. Pressure to compromise ethical standards was felt in 33 percent of companies having a weak ethical culture versus only 7 percent where the ethical culture was strong. Employees in companies with weak cultures failed to report observed misconduct 48 percent of the time, but only 6 percent of employees in companies with strong cultures didn't report misconduct they observed. Retaliation after reporting misconduct was also more prevalent in weaker cultures ‒ 46 percent versus 28 percent in companies with strong cultures.
 
The 2011 NBES showed declines in both critical drivers of a company's ethical culture ‒ the actions of senior leaders and of supervisors. Confidence in the ethics of senior leaders declined from 68 percent to 62 percent, equaling the all-time low reflected in the 2000 study. The proportion of employees who believe their supervisors act as ethical leaders fell from 76 percent in 2009 to 66 percent in the latest study. In another sign of weakening ethical cultures, the proportion of employees that said they were confident they could properly handle an ethics situation fell from 86 percent in 2009 to 77 percent in 2011.
 
Because of the increased use of social media in recent years, the 2011 NBES included questions about social networks and active users. These questions provided surprising findings from the experiences of active social networkers ‒ defined as those who spend 30 percent or more of their workday using social network sites. The ethical experiences of this group are so far outside the range of their colleagues that they had a significant influence on the overall findings.
 
Comparisons of active social networkers with the remainder of the sample showed networkers experienced far more negative ethical events than their counterparts:
  • Observed misconduct: 72 percent of networkers versus 54 percent of the rest.
  • Felt pressure to compromise standards: 42 percent versus 11 percent.
  • Experienced retaliation after reporting misconduct: 56 percent versus 18 percent.

Even more disturbing, perhaps, are findings that active social networkers appear to believe that many questionable ethical actions are actually acceptable, including:

  • Buying personal items with your company credit card as long as you pay it back (42 percent of networkers believe this is acceptable behavior).
  • Doing a little less work to compensate for cuts in benefits or pay (51 percent).
  • Keeping a copy of confidential work documents in case you need them in your next job (50 percent).
  • Taking a copy of work software home and using it on your personal computer (46 percent).
  • "Friending" a client/customer on a social network (59 percent).
  • Blogging or tweeting negatively about your company or colleagues (42 percent).
  • Uploading vacation pictures to the company network or server so you can share them with coworkers (50 percent).
  • Using social networking to find out what your company's competitors are doing (54 percent).
In summary, the results of the 2011 NBES sound an alarm to business leaders to make strong business ethics a top priority in their strategic plans. The improved results in some areas could also just be a symptom of the current economic situation, and leaders need to remain vigilant about emphasizing the importance of a strong ethical culture and living up to that vision.
 
Related articles:
About the author
Curtis C. Verschoor, CMA, is a member of the IMA Committee on Ethics. He is the Emeritus Ledger & Quill Research Professor at the School of Accountancy and MIS and an honorary Senior Wicklander Research Fellow in the Institute for Business and Professional Ethics, both at DePaul University, Chicago. He is also a Research Scholar in the Center for Business Ethics at Bentley University, Waltham, Mass. His e-mail address is curtisverschoor@sbcglobal.net.
 
©2012 by the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA®), www.imanet.org; reprinted with permission
 
For guidance in applying the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice to your ethical dilemma, contact the IMA Ethics Helpline at (800) 245-1383 in the United States or Canada. In other countries, dial the AT&T USADirect Access Number from www.usa.att.com/traveler/index.jsp, then the above number.
 

You may like these other stories...

Amidst the dark clouds hovering over the IRS this year—ranging from the lingering Tea Party scandal to other improprieties to damaging budget cuts—at least there's a ray of sunshine in a new report from the...
SEC, Big Four Chinese affiliates make progress in talks over audit documentsMichael Rapoport of the Wall Street Journal reported that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Chinese affiliates of the Big Four...
Koskinen warns filing season could be most complicated yetImplementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act and the Affordable Care Act, combined with a tight budget and the possibility of Congress passing a late...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.
Nov 5Join CPA thought leader and peer reviewer Rob Cameron and learn ways to improve the outcome of your peer reviews while maximizing the value of your engagement workflow.
Nov 12This webcast presents basic principles of revenue recognition, including new ASU 2014-09 for the contract method. Also, CPAs in industries who want a refresher on revenue accounting standards will benefit.
Nov 18In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom, CPA tackles what to do when bad things happen to good spreadsheets.