Did Arthur Andersen Look the Other Way?
The SEC is maintaining that accounting done by Arthur Andersen for client, Waste Management Inc., may have crossed accounting independence lines and is adding fuel to the independence fire.
The Wall Street Journal reports that, “The case is shaping up as a possible centerpiece of a campaign by the SEC to demonstrate that conflicts of interest can be caused by the proliferation of consulting and other non-auditing services that numerous accounting firms routinely offer.”
Apparently an internal probe into Waste Management a few years back revealed the possibility of accounting that caused the company to have to pay a $3.5 million charge in 1998 and inspired the shareholders to file a suit against Arthur Andersen. The Big Five company agreed to settle for $220 million.
Reportedly, work done between 1991 and 1997 helped Andersen collect $50 million in consulting service fees and $10 million in fees from audit work. The Wall Street Journal reports that the SEC is trying to determine if Andersen auditors “looked the other way to keep consulting fees flowing.”
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.