As Demands on Directors Increase, So Does Pay

Betsy S. Atkins, a board member of three technology companies, has seen her workload as a director triple in the post-Enron environment. The time she spends in audit and compensation committee meetings has grown even more.

This is the new reality for Atkins and many other corporate board directors, who are working harder while facing greater risks of lawsuits and a fouled reputation if something goes wrong. Companies are responding by increasing directors’ pay to recognize that the job is more difficult, more visible and more time-consuming than ever, according to the New York Times.

Atkins, who is chief executive and owner of Baja LLC, a venture capital firm in Miami, said board-related business takes up 12 business days a month. Four employees help her manage the load. "This is not your grandfather’s board, where people just showed up and voted," she said.

Two years ago, directors said they spent about 150 hours a year on board business; now it’s 250 hours. Audit committee members can expect to spend at least twice that amount, said Roger W. Raber, president of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Edward Archer, a compensation consultant at Pearl Meyer & Partners, said total compensation for the average director last year ranged from $43,000 at small companies to $155,000 at the largest 200. Compensation, mostly in cash rather than stocks, will increase by at least 15 percent this year. He said audit and compensation committee chairmen often earn more than other directors for what Archer called "hazardous duty."

Corporate governance specialists told the Times that while a directorship still carries clout and handsome paycheck, fewer executives are willing to take on the job.

"Most searches these days are not a layup," said Dennis C. Carey, vice chairman of Spencer Stuart, an executive search firm. "The number of turndowns has increased dramatically over the past couple of years."

To recruit new board members, companies are looking beyond "marquee names" and seeking board members below the chief executive level, said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, associate dean of the Yale School of Management. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 says audit committee members must have substantial experience overseeing financial statements. New board members are increasingly retired business leaders and executives at the "C level," such as chief financial officers. These new directors, Sonnenfeld said, "have more current specialized knowledge and more available time."

You may like these other stories...

A proposal issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) last week explains how fair value measurement should be defined for state and local government financial reporting.The exposure draft, Fair Value...
By Jason Bramwell The board of trustees of the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) finalized a new policy on November 19 that provides the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) with direction on what...
By Jason Bramwell The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is now offering a free online toolkit designed to assist preparers and auditors of state and local government pension plans with implementing new...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.
Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.
Nov 5Join CPA thought leader and peer reviewer Rob Cameron and learn ways to improve the outcome of your peer reviews while maximizing the value of your engagement workflow.
Nov 12This webcast presents basic principles of revenue recognition, including new ASU 2014-09 for the contract method. Also, CPAs in industries who want a refresher on revenue accounting standards will benefit.