Congress Should 'Butt Out' of FASB Issue
J. Edward Katz, an accounting professor at Penn State University, claims members of Congress don’t understand the accounting issues at hand in the recent controversy over a proposed Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ruling regarding the accounting treatment of merging companies.
FASB is proposing doing away with the pooling of interests method of accounting when companies merge. Katz described the effects of the pooling method as resulting in situations where “investors cannot read the financial statements” of companies whose assets and liabilities have been pooled. Katz believes pooling gives managers an opportunity to create and display fictitious revenues, and to create gains, which can result in “a fraudulent statement of the firm’s earnings.”
Detractors of the proposed FASB ruling claim the ruling would stifle mergers and restrict U.S. economic growth.
California Congressmen Christopher Cox (R) and Calvin Dooley (D) have introduced legislation in an attempt to delay implementation of the proposed FASB standard, claiming it would reduce incentives for business combinations and, as a result, harm the high-tech industry.
Most importantly, Katz claims Congress should “butt out” because the FASB should be allowed to do its job. “If Congress intervenes, it would damage whatever authority and credibility the FASB possesses.”
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.