Standard & Poor's Sets Standard For Core Earnings

Standard & Poor's stepped into a standard-setting vacuum on May 14, 2002 and introduced a new set of definitions for measures of corporate earnings commonly used by the financial community. The newly-defined measure of core earnings will soon take on added importance, as the firm plans to incorporate this measure into its COMPUSTAT database for the U.S. and in its U.S. equity indices, including the S&P 500.

In addition to core earnings, Standard & Poor's considered "as reported" earnings, operating earnings and pro forma earnings. Highlights of definitions from the firm's white paper are as follows:

  • As reported earnings include all charges except those related to discontinued operations, the impact of cumulative accounting changes, and extraordinary items as defined by generally accepted accounting principles.
  • Operating earnings start with as reported earnings and exclude charges seen as corporate or one-time expenses. The paper says this measure is popular in corporate reports and seems to have been borrowed from management accountability reporting that is designed to measure business unit performance excluding corporate-level costs.
  • Pro forma earnings originally meant a special analysis of a major change, such as a merger, where adjustments were made for an "as if" review. However, in recent times, the specific items included in "as if" reviews have not been clearly defined, leading to confusion and abuses.
  • Core earnings include all the revenues and costs associated with a company's ongoing operations. These earnings include employee stock option grant expenses, restructuring charges from ongoing operations, write-downs of depreciable or amortizable operating assets, pension costs, and purchased research and development expenses. They exclude goodwill impairment charges, gains or losses from asset sales, pension gains, unrealized gains or losses from hedging activities, expenses related to mergers or acquisitions, and litigation or insurance settlements and proceeds.

In a fact sheet of frequently asked questions, Standard & Poor's answered the question: Why use core earnings to recalculate a company’s operating earnings? Aren't current accounting practices sufficient? Its answer: In the last few years, the reliability of earnings reports has dramatically decreased. As Standard & Poor's business is based on providing investors with reliable information, analysis and advice, it believes it is time for the investment community at large to take corrective action. . . . Earnings reports must be understandable, consistent and transparent.

Read the white paper and fact sheet.

-Rosemary Schlank

You may like these other stories...

Inversions: Loophole Is the ProblemJacob J. Lew, the U.S. Treasury Secretary, published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal that "the system has become full of inefficiencies and special-interest loopholes. That...
School tax breaks get House support as Democrats objectRichard Rubin of Bloomberg reported that the House of Representatives on Thursday voted to expand and simplify tax breaks for education as Republicans continue to pass...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has relaunched its technical agenda web page, which Chairman Russell Golden said will inform visitors at a glance on where any given FASB project stands, the steps it took to...

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Jul 31
In this session Excel expert David Ringstrom helps beginners get up to speed in Microsoft Excel. However, even experienced Excel users will learn some new tricks, particularly when David discusses under-utilized aspects of Excel.
Aug 5
This webcast will focus on accounting and disclosure policies for various types of consolidations and business combinations.
Aug 20
In this session we'll review best practices for how to generate interest in your firm’s services.
Aug 21
Meet budgets and client expectations using project management skills geared toward the unique challenges faced by CPAs. Kristen Rampe will share how knowing the keys to structuring and executing a successful project can make the difference between success and repeated failures.