More Automated Check Payments = More Scams | AccountingWEB

More Automated Check Payments = More Scams

In what has been termed “the e-commerce equivalent of mugging,” scammers are targeting checking accounts as an easy access point for fraud.

The huge number of automatic checking account withdrawals and deposits is opening the door to the increase in fraud. According to the Washington Post, the automated check-clearing system handles 10 billion electronic transactions a year, prompting regulators at the Federal Reserve to warn banks that "dishonest persons are using the automated clearinghouse to originate unauthorized debits."

Consumers are happy to give up paper checks for the convenience of payroll checks being directly deposited or mortgage payments being debited automatically from their checking accounts. However, scammers are using cheap but sophisticated tools to print checks and exploit the system that allows companies to write unsigned paper checks for a consumer who wants to pay a bill at the last minute or buy from a telemarketer.

The combination of unsigned checks and the automated check-clearing process creates a ripe environment for fraud. Thieves can make thousands of fake payment requests and potentially walk away with millions.

Shereen Greene, an Atlanta paralegal, was one victim. She found a $139 charge from, a company she had never heard of. The canceled check was a fake. It listed an old address and her maiden name, which she hadn’t used in seven years. Her signature was missing, but since the account number was correct, the transaction was approved.

Consumer advocates say there are too few protections in place for people like Greene. There are no federal rules instructing banks what to do when a depositor challenges an unsigned paper check. Banks point to the correct account number as proof that the withdrawal was authorized, so it can be difficult to convince banks that the charge is fraudulent.

Banks have traditionally been held to tight standards for managing sensitive customer information, but merchants that have access to account numbers don’t follow the same rules, the Post reported. The third-party processing firms often handle the transactions for merchants, by depositing customer checks into banks or processing the electronic account information.

Elliott C. McEntee, president and chief executive of NACHA, the electronic payments association, said, "When a bank permits a third party to process transactions on behalf of a merchant, it's putting a lot of confidence in the third party" to make sure that the merchant is legitimate. "Unfortunately in a few cases," he added, "banks have not exercised their fiduciary responsibilities and they have allowed third parties to enter payments" that are not valid.

In Greene’s case, she was able to recover the $139 taken from her account, but not before she made many phone calls over a few weeks and paid $70 for a new account number and new checks.

Wait, there's more!
There's always more at AccountingWEB. We're an active community of financial professionals and journalists who strive to bring you valuable content every day. If you'd like, let us know your interests and we'll send you a few articles every week either in taxation, practice excellence, or just our most popular stories from that week. It's free to sign up and to be a part of our community.
Premium content is currently locked

Editor's Choice

As part of our continued effort to provide valuable resources and insight to our subscribers, we're conducting this brief survey to learn more about your personal experiences in the accounting profession. We will be giving away five $50 Amazon gift cards, and a $250 Amazon gift card to one lucky participant.
This is strictly for internal use and data will not be sold
or shared with any third parties.