Minimum wage set to increase today
The federal minimum wage will rise from $5.15 to $5.85 per hour on Tuesday, July 24, 2007, the first of three increases that will take place over the next two years.
Over the next two years, the federal minimum wage will rise from to $7.25 per hour in three steps. The federal minimum wage will increase to:
- $5.85 per hour on July 24, 2007
- $6.55 per hour on July 24, 2008
- $7.25 per hour on July 24, 2009
Employees last saw an increase in the federal minimum wage in 1997. Since then, most states have raised their minimum wages above both the old and new federal minimum wage. Therefore, most states and the District of Columbia won't be affected by the first step of the federal increase.
Workers in most states will not be affected by the upcoming increase in the federal minimum wage to $5.85, according to CCH, a leading provider of human resources information and software and part of Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. That's because 32 states and the District of Columbia have minimum wages higher than the new federal level.
"Over the last ten years, while the federal minimum wage has been steady at $5.15 per hour, more and more states have set their minimum wages above that, and above the new minimum as well," said Barbara O'Dell, JD, CCH workplace analyst.
States began to pass minimum wage laws early in the last century, often as a way to protect women workers, but the U.S. Supreme Court overturned them, and a federal attempt to fix wages, until the mid 1930s. In 1937, the Court upheld a Washington law mandating a minimum wage for women workers. Then, Congress passed a federal minimum wage of 25 cents an hour as part of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in 1938, and it too was upheld as constitutional in 1941.
When Rates Differ
Where state and federal minimum wage rates differ, the higher rate prevails.
Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Tennessee do not have state minimum wage laws, so employers must pay the federal rate to employees who are subject to the FLSA.
In Georgia, Kansas, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming, the state minimum wage rates are lower than the revised federal rate, so employers must pay the federal rate to employees who are subject to the FLSA (however, the New Mexico rate will increase to $6.50 on January 1, 2008).
In Idaho, Indiana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Virginia, the state rates are tied to the federal rate and will automatically increase (however, the New Hampshire rate will then increase to $6.50 on September 1, 2007).
The remaining states and the District of Columbia have minimum wage rates that will equal or exceed the federal rate on July 24, 2007. Employers in these states must continue to pay the state rate as long as it remains higher than the federal rate. In Minnesota, Montana and Nevada, some employers currently paying a state-authorized lower minimum wage based on their size or offering benefits will be affected by the federal increase.
If the federal rate increases above the state rate, the federal rate applies, and the federal hourly rate is scheduled to increase to $6.55 on July 24, 2008 and to $7.25 on July 24, 2009. For a timeline of federal minimum wage rates 1938-2009, you can view the Minimum Wage Chart.
"Employers -- especially those who operate in several different states -- will have to keep aware of a changing environment as federal and state rates criss-cross in the years ahead," O'Dell said.
A state-by-state list of hourly wage rates follows for states at or above the new federal level as of July 24, 2007.
Hourly Minimum Wage Rates as of July 24, 2007
|District of Columbia||$7.00|
(1)Minnesota: $5.25 for employers with less than $625,000 in gross annual sales
(2)Montana: $4.00 for employers with $110,000 or less in gross annual sales
(3)Nevada: $5.15 if qualified health benefits are offered
(4)Pennsylvania: $6.65 for employers with 10 or fewer employees
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.