Management Shakeup May Lie Ahead for Fannie Mae

Days after Fannie Mae's federal regulator released a highly critical report on the mortgage giant's accounting practices, observers say top management may not survive the fallout.

Fannie Mae's regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), conducted an eight-month investigation and found such pervasive problems that OFHEO suggested a management change.

“These findings cannot be explained as mere differences in interpretation of accounting principles, but clear instances in which management sought to misapply and ignore accounting principles," OFHEO Director Armando Falcon said in the letter to Fannie Mae's board, Reuters reported.

The report said that Fannie Mae failed to apply generally accepted accounting principles, manipulated earnings to lessen the appearance of volatility and aimed to meet Wall Street's profit expectations and hand out generous bonuses to executives.

The letter outlined steps the company should take, including having non-management directors correct accounting irregularities, strengthening the company's capital position and tightening internal controls. Falcon said in the letter, "We must consider the accountability of management and whether we have sufficient confidence in management to fully implement these corrective measures.”

Reuters reported that most of the blame in the report is laid on Chief Financial Officer Timothy Howard, although the responsibility may fall on the shoulders of Chief Executive Franklin Raines.

"If you look at what major corporations are doing, where there are widespread failures relating to accounting practices, both the CEO's and the CFO's heads roll," said Jacob Frenkel, a former Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement lawyer and federal prosecutor.

CBS News reported that the company on Thursday made amendments to work agreements with Raines, Howard, and Chief Operating Office Daniel Mudd that tightened the definition of the circumstances by which an executive can be fired for "cause." The new terms say "cause" constitutes being convicted of, or pleading no contest to a felony, or if the executive "materially harms" Fannie Mae through fraud, dishonesty, willful misconduct or doing their job in a grossly negligent manner.

The amendments to the work agreements must be approved by the director of OFHEO.

Meanwhile, a law firm claims Fannie Mae's false statements pumped up its stock price. The suit says the company deferred expenses to meet targets that would trigger pay bonuses and improperly accounted for its enterprise's derivatives transactions and hedging activities.

The law firm of Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll PLLC said the class period runs from Oct. 11, 2000, to Sept. 22, 2004.

Fannie Mae officials have retained outside counsel and will hire an independent auditor to respond to regulators.

You may like these other stories...

Read more from Larry Perry here and in the Today's World of Audits archive.The first part discussed the principles of revenue recognition under the FRF for SMEs. This part will focus on auditing issues, including some...
Accounting group pushes back against retirement age scrutinyMichael Rapoport of the Wall Street Journal reported that the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) on Monday pushed back against federal regulators who are again...
Tesco accounting probe finds “inappropriate behavior” by staff – reportsClare Hutchison of Reuters wrote on Sunday that an investigation into a 250 million-pound ($402 million) profit overstatement at...

Already a member? log in here.

Upcoming CPE Webinars

Oct 22This webinar will include discussions of important issues in AU-C 800, Audits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks.
Oct 23Amber Setter will show the value of leadership assessments as tools for individual and organizational leadership development initiatives.
Oct 30Many Excel users have a love-hate relationship with workbook links.
Nov 5Join CPA thought leader and peer reviewer Rob Cameron and learn ways to improve the outcome of your peer reviews while maximizing the value of your engagement workflow.