FASB Moves Forward on Accounting for SPEs
Under pressure to set accounting standards for the kinds of special purpose entities (SPEs) that kept debt off Enron's balance sheet, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has tentatively decided on an approach and directed its staff to begin writing an exposure draft.
The approach will be a blend of the Consolidated Policy-Modified Approach as of Sept. 27, 2000 for "Entities with Limited Powers" and a more recent paper that proposed a possible interpretation of FASB Statement No. 94 on Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries. The Board also considered the approach used by the International Accounting Standards Board in its SIC-12 on Consolidation—Special Purpose Entities.
If the new standard is adopted as currently contemplated, some companies will be required to include more entities in their consolidated statements. Ray Simpson, who heads FASB's consolidation policy project said the FASB has tentatively decided to increase a key threshold for start-up equity from independent investors from its current level of 3 percent to 10 percent, thereby requiring greater investments by third parties before SPEs could be kept off consolidated balance sheets.
The accounting for SPEs has been under consideration by FASB since the mid-1980s as part of the broader issue of determining when one company is in control of another. Simply stated, SPEs are entities set up for narrow purposes. As part of its project, the FASB hopes to better define these entities by providing a list of their common characteristics.
The FASB must seek public comment before adopting any new standards. An optimistic timetable would call for issuance of an exposure draft sometime during the second quarter of 2002, with a final statement possible by the end of the year.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.