FASB Increases Relevance & Comparability of Income Tax in Financial Reporting
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on Thursday issued an interpretation that increases the relevancy and comparability of financial reporting by clarifying the way companies account for uncertainty in income taxes.
“T[his] interpretation reflects our concerns that widespread diversity in practice, including inconsistent measurement associated with uncertainty in accounting for income taxes, has resulted in less relevant, less comparable and less complete information for investors and other users of financial statements,” Edward W. Trott, FASB Member, said in a prepared statement announcing the final interpretation. “Consequently, we are addressing these concerns by requiring all tax positions be evaluated using consistent criteria and measurement and further supplemented by enhanced disclosure.”
Accordingly, the newly released interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement attribute, as well as clear criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing and measuring such tax positions for financial statement purposes. The Interpretation also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income taxes. Currently, the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which is based upon the validity of a tax position, is subject to significant and varied interpretations that have resulted in diverse and inconsistent accounting practices and measurements.
This Interpretation, which incorporates input received from FASB constituents, as well as views expressed during a public roundtable, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.