Cost of Hurricane Rita Lower Than Expected but Still in Top Ten
Insurers including Allstate Corp. and St. Paul Travelers Cos. estimate insured storm damage from Hurricane Rita may reach $6 billion, Bloomberg.com reports, less than a third of analysts’ early predictions. Paul Supple of State Farm Insurance said that estimates were lower because Rita’s path took it to the east of the densely populated areas of Galveston and Houston.
Robert Hartwig, chief economist with the Insurance Information Institute estimates the cost may be less, $4.5 billion. “We dodged a bullet,” he told the LA Times, but his estimate would still put Rita among the 10 most costly hurricanes to hit the US.
Insurance claims for Katrina, the most expensive storm in history, could go as high as $60 billion, Bloomberg.com reports. Charley and Ivan, two of the four storms that struck Florida last year, each cost insurers more than $7 billion.
It is still too early to estimate costs to the nation’s energy infrastructure from Rita, the Wall Street Journal reports. Information has not yet been released about damage offshore, to the platforms that pump oil and natural gas and the underwater pipelines that carry the oil and gas. Very little infrastructure damage caused by Katrina has been repaired to date, according to the Journal.
Valero Energy’s refinery near Port Arthur suffered “significant damage” according to the Journal report, and could take a month to restart. Other refineries reported minor damage.
Governor Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana has announced that she will ask Congress for $20.2 billion to rebuild and upgrade levees and pumping capacity around New Orleans and Morgan City, Louisiana, Reuters reports. An additional $11.5 billion will be needed to repair the transportation infrastructure, including highways, ports and airports, the governor said.
Voice of the Editor
Which isn’t completely true. I mean, occasionally I drop by when I manage to sneak out of the nonstop frat party over at Going Concern, but I’m mostly a wallflower over there. I’m happy to say that I’ve been given express permission (or explicit orders, if you like) to wander over here to AccountingWEB more often.
Why is that, you might ask? My job is to replace the irreplaceable Gail Perry as Editor-in-Chief. What does that mean? I don’t really know! I think it’ll be fun getting a feel for things, throwing in my own thoughts here and there, and listening to the discussions you’re having about the accounting profession.